[issue24283] Print not safe in signal handlers

STINNER Victor added the comment: > It doesn't do any of those things in Python 2, to my knowledge. Well, even if Python 2 doesn't warn you, threading_print_test.py is also wrong on Python 2. Python 3 is better because it warns you :-) > Why aren't we willing to make this work? It would be v

[issue24283] Print not safe in signal handlers

Devin Jeanpierre added the comment: It doesn't do any of those things in Python 2, to my knowledge. Why aren't we willing to make this work? -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue24283] Print not safe in signal handlers

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > RuntimeError: reentrant call inside <_io.BufferedWriter name=''> As the exception message suggests: the IO stack is not reentrant. If an ongoing IO call is interrupted by a signal, and the signal handler calls again into the IO stack, this situation is detec

[issue24283] Print not safe in signal handlers

Changes by R. David Murray : -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pyth

[issue24283] Print not safe in signal handlers

New submission from Devin Jeanpierre: The code attached runs a while loop that prints, and has a signal handler that also prints. There is a thread that constantly fires off signals, but this is just to ensure the condition for the bug happens -- this is a bug with signal handling, not threads