[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-08-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I worry that many things were not recoded in Misc/NEWS at all, especially in the early days of 3.0 development (e.g. in the p3yk branch :-). I'm not sure if it's possible to fix this retroactively, however. As long as we keep the changes b

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-08-16 Thread Benjamin Peterson
Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: I'm a little confused on what needs to happen here. It's "incomplete" because it gets skipped in merges, but "2.6 ports don't need to be in 3.0". -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson ___ Python tracker <

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-08-05 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Let's see if we can fix this by beta3. -- assignee: gvanrossum -> priority: -> release blocker ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-03-28 Thread Georg Brandl
Changes by Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- assignee: georg.brandl -> gvanrossum __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mail

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-03-21 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > Do you mean "skipping stuff merged from 2.6" ? Yes :) __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ P

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-03-21 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > but skipping stuff merged from 3.0. Do you mean "skipping stuff merged from 2.6" ? -- nosy: +tiran __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-03-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Correct. Martin & I just discussed this. We'll empty the current 3.0 NEWS file and start adding stuff consistently from 3.0a3, but skipping stuff merged from 3.0. For the big changes since 2.x, people will have to refer to other porting d

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-03-17 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Stuff ported from 2.6 needn't be in the 3.0 NEWS, needs it? __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Pyt

[issue2310] Reorganize the 3.0 Misc/NEWS file

2008-03-16 Thread Guido van Rossum
New submission from Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The 3.0 Misc/NEWS file is a mess. It is vastly incomplete because it usually gets skipped during merges rather than resolving the conflicts. -- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation messages: 63597 nosy: georg.brandl,