[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Committed with just "bytes-like object". Thank you David for your review. -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 853e3e115db4 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4': Issue #22581: Use more "bytes-like object" throughout the docs and comments. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/853e3e115db4 New changeset 450a025b1669 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

R. David Murray added the comment: Yeah, just ignore the unicodeobject.c comment comment. It seems to me that the stuff in the parens is supposed to be a precise description of what the format code handles, with elaboration in the following text. So I'd prefer to just use the :term: in those

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thank you David. I have left enumerations of concrete bytes-like classes (bytes and bytearray) because I thought that it is good to be more verbose in the documentation. I left the decision how write it to you: ":class:`bytes`, :class:`bytearray` or :term:`

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

R. David Murray added the comment: Made some review comments. The last comment change (deletion) in unicodeobject.c is not as obvious as the other changes were; I'm not familiar enough with the C API to know why it is correct. I trust you on that, though :) -- __

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Regenerated for review. I don't know why Rietweld didn't like previous patch. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37276/bytes_like.patch ___ Python tracker

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

R. David Murray added the comment: There's no review link. And no obvious reason why there isn't. Could you try regenerating the patch and uploading it again? -- ___ Python tracker __

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Could anyone please look at the patch? It touches only docs and comments. -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg231643 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Could anyone please look at the patch? I touches only docs and comments. -- keywords: +needs review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Here is a patch which fixes remnants. It also corrects descriptions of parsing arguments format units. -- keywords: +patch stage: needs patch -> patch review Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37169/bytes_like.patch __

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list maili

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

Changes by Stefan Krah : -- nosy: -skrah ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.o

[issue22581] Other mentions of the buffer protocol

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: In addition to issue16518. There are other non-fixed messages (may be introduced after 3.3): >>> b''.join(['']) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: sequence item 0: expected bytes, bytearray, or an object with the buffer in