[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Charalampos Stratakis added the comment: @Łukasz Would it be possible to review the patch? Or is it preferable to open a new issue? -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Charalampos Stratakis added the comment: @Łukasz Dug a bit more to it. Yes it is RPM specific for that case, in the sense that we create different subfolders for the debug and the normal(optimized) builds under the build/ dir, where the Include directory does not exist. the dtrace wrapper ass

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by Berker Peksag : -- stage: patch review -> resolved ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: h

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by Łukasz Langa : -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Uns

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Łukasz Langa added the comment: Yes, let's close this. @Charalampos, the error in your build comes from the /usr/bin/dtrace wrapper: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dtrace", line 440, in sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/bin/dtrace", line 385, in main providers.probe_wri

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Berker Peksag added the comment: Thanks. SilentGhost. I went with ".. highlight:: shell-session" to simplify the patch a bit. Łukasz, can we close this one and create new issues for further improvements now? -- ___ Python tracker

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset d05d312161f2 by Berker Peksag in branch '3.6': Issue #21590: Silence Sphinx warnings in instrumentation.rst https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d05d312161f2 New changeset 442453fa3370 by Berker Peksag in branch 'default': Issue #21590: Merge from 3.6

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Charalampos Stratakis added the comment: Fedora so far has been using the systemtap patch downstream from dmalcolm [0]. So for 3.6 by removing the systemtap patch (it cannot be applied anymore cleanly) and by enabling the --with-dtrace configure flag I get this error [1]: make: *** [Makefile:8

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

SilentGhost added the comment: Here is the patch that fixes warning in /Doc/howto/instrumentation.rst as well as cleans up a few nits here and there. I've removed attempt at highlighting using c since that doesn't work in practice. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +berker.peksag stage: -> pa

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

SilentGhost added the comment: Building the documentation on Ubuntu 16.10, I started getting the following warnings: /Doc/howto/instrumentation.rst:58: WARNING: Could not lex literal_block as "python3". Highlighting skipped. /Doc/howto/instrumentation.rst:139: WARNING: Could not lex literal_bl

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Kubilay Kocak added the comment: @Łukasz in case you're not aware, all koobs-freebsd* bots are DTrace enabled, and can be tested with the custom builder. I'm on IRC (python-dev) if you need anything from me to help progress this -- ___ Python tracke

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by Kubilay Kocak : -- nosy: +koobs ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Łukasz Langa added the comment: Landed during the 3.6 beta1 sprint: https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d622dbd71f2b Thanks all for the preliminary tasks! I rebuilt the patch from first principles, reusing large parts of Jesús' work, as well as work by Dave and Nikhil. Things deliberately left

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by cburroughs : -- nosy: +cburroughs ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pytho

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by Augie Fackler : -- nosy: +durin42 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pytho

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Nikhil Benesch added the comment: Since it looks like development on this has stalled, I took the liberty of compiling all prior patches https://github.com/benesch/python-dtrace-tracker and am actively working on merging them into one superpatch. I am neither a Python nor a DTrace expert,

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by Xavier Morel : -- nosy: +xmorel ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda added the comment: I'd really prefer IRC, if at all possible for you :) When online, I'm usually on #fedora-python, but I can really come any channel of your choice. Sorry for the delays in communication, I've got a lot on my plate right now and I'll probably not be ve

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Changes by Dave Malcolm : -- nosy: +dmalcolm ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pytho

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Bohuslav, do you have Jabber/XMPP?. Mine is "j...@jabber.org". This thing will require real time communication. I rather prefer XMPP/Jabber, but I could accept IRC :-) -- ___ Python tracker

[issue21590] Systemtap and DTrace support

New submission from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda: This is a tracking bug for development of combined systemtap and dtrace patch for Python. The separate patches were submitted at [1] (systemtap) and [2] (dtrace). Since it was agreed that it'd be best to merge the two patches to reuse as much code