[issue21181] Inconsistent Definition of collections.namedtuple.__dict__ in _source

Raymond Hettinger added the comment: > whatever compelled the developer to declare the named fields > using _property seems to be ignored in the definition of __dict__. What compelled the _property alias is that the user could name an attribute "property" which would cause a conflict if _prope

[issue21181] Inconsistent Definition of collections.namedtuple.__dict__ in _source

Changes by Eric Snow : -- nosy: +rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python

[issue21181] Inconsistent Definition of collections.namedtuple.__dict__ in _source

Changes by Raymond Hettinger : -- assignee: -> rhettinger ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http

[issue21181] Inconsistent Definition of collections.namedtuple.__dict__ in _source

New submission from Jim Peterson: The result returned by somenamedtuple._source seem inconsistent, in that it defines __dict__ as: __dict__ = property(_asdict) even though it imports property as: from builtins import property as _property and the namedtuple fields are defined using _prop