[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Added comments on Rietveld. The patch is slightly outdated, so I can't test it. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

Stefan Krah added the comment: Is this a political nosying? -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://ma

[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

Stefan Krah added the comment: Unassigning, since I've no time for reviewing (I think the patch needs review though, either by Mark or Raymond). -- assignee: skrah -> ___ Python tracker ___

[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

Zachary Ware added the comment: Stefan Krah wrote: > In any case, I would prefer a patch without stylistic changes. > Elimination of "return" is a personal preference, so are the > whitespace changes. The returns were removed in #19572, to reduce false positives in searching for silently skippe

[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

Stefan Krah added the comment: Assigning to myself, since my private 100% coverage test suite would have to be updated as well. I have just glanced at the patch and only have some superficial remarks: In any case, I would prefer a patch without stylistic changes. Elimination of "return" is a p

[issue20008] Clean up/refactor/make discoverable test_decimal

New submission from Zachary Ware: This patch makes extensive changes to test_decimal, with the ultimate goal of making `python -m unittest discover Lib/test/ "test_*.py"` not choke on test_decimal (see issue16748). Trying to do so uncovered a few other issues, such as some tests not properly