[issue19886] Better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: commit review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed versions: +Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue19886] Better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I never decreased requirements, so these changes shouldn't cause regressions. -- assignee: -> serhiy.storchaka stage: patch review -> commit review ___ Python tracker __

[issue19886] Better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset aee672ba9c38 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #19886: Use better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/aee672ba9c38 New changeset 2ca26065fb00 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.3': Issue #19886: Us

[issue19886] Better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: These are experimental values. I hacked tests and ran them with less sizes (using `ulimit -v` to hard limit memory size). And then I had approximated measured values. On Windows values can be larger (due different memory management). -- ___

[issue19886] Better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Why did you compute those estimates? When coming up with factors such as 3.3 or 3.57 (!), it would be nice to add a comment to explain the reasoning. (otherwise, thanks a lot for doing this) -- ___ Python tracker <

[issue19886] Better estimated memory requirements for bigmem tests

New submission from Serhiy Storchaka: Some bigmem tests actually consume much more memory than declare. This can cause swapping and too long time of test run. Here is a patch which improves estimates. -- components: Tests files: bigmem_tests.patch keywords: patch messages: 205236 nosy: