Barry A. Warsaw added the comment:
It seems to me that the right thing to add a related PEPs section to any PEP
which needs it, but I don't think we need an official header for it. Thus, I'm
closing this PEP as Won't Fix. Feel free to open new bugs for any specific PEP
that needs additional
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Yeah, I think the problem in this case is specific to the multi-versioned PEPs
like the WSGI reference and the metadata standards. In that case, a separate
section in the document itself seems more appropriate than a generic header
field.
We should consider a s
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Re-reading the original post, I see that a section (or paragraph) was an option
Brandon requested. Changed title to reflect remaining issue.
--
title: PEP should note if it has been superseded -> PEP should note related PEPs
___
