[issue17270] make the section header doc convention more clearly optional

2013-02-21 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Changes by Chris Jerdonek : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: commit review -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue17270] make the section header doc convention more clearly optional

2013-02-21 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset fa06f733e2fe by Chris Jerdonek in branch 'default': Issue #17270: clarify that the section header doc convention is optional. http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/fa06f733e2fe -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python

[issue17270] make the section header doc convention more clearly optional

2013-02-21 Thread Ezio Melotti
Ezio Melotti added the comment: LGTM -- stage: patch review -> commit review ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue17270] make the section header doc convention more clearly optional

2013-02-21 Thread Chris Jerdonek
New submission from Chris Jerdonek: The documentation guidelines in the devguide list a convention for section headers: http://docs.python.org/devguide/documenting.html#sections The current wording, however, can be interpreted to mean that this convention is always (and should always) be used