[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2014-07-02 Thread Berker Peksag
Changes by Berker Peksag : -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://ma

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2014-07-02 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: Well, I've closed it as out-of-date. -- resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2014-07-02 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Is it worth applying the patch as the imp module is deprecated since version 3.4? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2012-11-28 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Andrew Svetlov added the comment: I think nothing bad to push additional tests into 3.3 also. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bug

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2012-11-23 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Changes by Andrew Svetlov : -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.pyth

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2012-11-14 Thread Eric Snow
Changes by Eric Snow : -- nosy: +eric.snow ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.o

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2012-11-14 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Jesús Cea Avión added the comment: Not sure increasing test coverage would be tolerated in 3.3.1. I would be +1 to it. -- nosy: +jcea versions: +Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker __

[issue16474] More code coverage for imp module

2012-11-14 Thread alejandro david weil
New submission from alejandro david weil: Add some 5% more code-coverage for imp module in tests. -- components: Tests files: imp_test_patch.diff keywords: patch messages: 175597 nosy: brett.cannon, tenuki priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: More code coverage for imp m