[issue15638] incorrect version info for TextIOWrapper write_through docs

2012-08-13 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: Ah, thank you. I see. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http

[issue15638] incorrect version info for TextIOWrapper write_through docs

2012-08-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- resolution: -> rejected stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue15638] incorrect version info for TextIOWrapper write_through docs

2012-08-13 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: See 9144014028f3. It was part of a bugfix in the 3.2 branch, therefore it wasn't exposed as a public API. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue15638] incorrect version info for TextIOWrapper write_through docs

2012-08-13 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Chris Jerdonek added the comment: The C version seems to have it in 3.2 as well: http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/5b629e9fde61/Modules/_io/textio.c#l818 Is it possible you were thinking of issue 15571 (not "used" in Python version but still respected)? -- ___

[issue15638] incorrect version info for TextIOWrapper write_through docs

2012-08-13 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: If I remember correctly it existed in one of the versions (python vs C) but not in both. Or, it existed but wasn't actually respected by one of the versions. -- nosy: +pitrou, r.david.murray ___ Python tracker

[issue15638] incorrect version info for TextIOWrapper write_through docs

2012-08-13 Thread Chris Jerdonek
New submission from Chris Jerdonek: The io.TextIOWrapper documentation says that the write_through argument was added in version 3.3: "Changed in version 3.3: The write_through argument has been added." http://docs.python.org/dev/library/io.html#io.TextIOWrapper However, it seems to be presen