Ezio Melotti added the comment:
The devguide already mentions core-mentorship [0][1], and people already ping
issues there when necessary, so I agree that this can be closed.
[0]: http://docs.python.org/devguide/help.html#core-mentorship
[1]: http://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html#build-dep
Brett Cannon added the comment:
Is this still desired? I think it would be better to simply have a message in
experts.html to say that if you need help finding someone then email
core-mentorship instead of having a list that must be maintained.
--
status: open -> pending
_
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
Here is an initial patch based on the core developers who responded on
core-mentorship.
In response to Ezio's comment (after thinking further), I think the goal would
be to provide a list of people that new contributors should feel welcome to add
to the nosy
Chris Jerdonek added the comment:
> I think you should better define the goal of this new section.
I see your point and may not have fully understood the intent. I'll defer to
Nick on this since the initial suggestion was his. I'm not personally wedded
to any particular resolution of the iss
Ezio Melotti added the comment:
I think you should better define the goal of this new section.
How would people use this information?
* If it's just to know what developers are on the core-mentorship list, I think
it's a bit pointless, especially because not all of them might want to be
listed
New submission from Chris Jerdonek:
On the core-mentorship list, Nick Coghlan suggested adding an "area" to the
Experts Index for core developers who are on the core-mentorship list (or at
least those who wish to be listed).
This issue is to do that. This can be done by adding a row to the
M
