[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Steve Dower added the comment: Distutils is now deprecated (see PEP 632) and all tagged issues are being closed. From now until removal, only release blocking issues will be considered for distutils. If this issue does not relate to distutils, please remove the component and reopen it. If y

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Change by Giovanni Cappellotto : -- nosy: -potomak ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://m

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Change by STINNER Victor : -- keywords: -easy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.p

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

STINNER Victor added the comment: > Why are can I still find these issues in the "Easy issues" list? My bad... I only added a comment but forgot to remove the easy keyword. It's now removed ;-) -- ___ Python tracker

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Joannah Nanjekye added the comment: @Giovanni , If you look closely, the issue still has the easy issue label that is why you still see it in the "Easy issues" list. Which means he has not removed the label yet. -- nosy: +nanjekyejoannah ___ Pyth

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Giovanni Cappellotto added the comment: Hi Victor, This is the 3rd issue in a row I found in the "Easy issues" list where you added a comment saying > I remove the "Easy" label Why are can I still find these issues in the "Easy issues" list? Do you mean that you already removed the "Easy"

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

STINNER Victor added the comment: This issue is 7 years old: it's far from being "newcomer friendly", I remove the "Easy" label. -- nosy: +vstinner ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Wichert Akkerman added the comment: Éric is not quite correct: I currently have a package where "python setup.py check" does not show any error, but PyPI still refuses to format my long description. Likewise "python setup.py --long-description | rst2html-2.7.py > /dev/null" also does not revea

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Éric Araujo added the comment: Reclassifying as distutils feature request. -- assignee: eric.araujo -> components: +Distutils -Distutils2 versions: +Python 3.5 -3rd party ___ Python tracker ___

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Martin v. Löwis added the comment: > One maintenance issue is the possible discrepancy between PyPI’s > checks and distutils2’s; if the PyPI maintainers agree to announce > all changes to catalog-sig it could work (just like for classifiers). We can certainly try to remember, but I expect t

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Chris Jerdonek added the comment: With regard to the maintenance issue, what about the idea of aiming for PyPI to include that logic in a separately packaged module? Then there would be no need to cut and paste -- just include the right version. If that were done, depending on how the pysetu

[issue15266] Perform the same checks as PyPI for Description field

Éric Araujo added the comment: This easy way exists: “pysetup run check” checks the rst syntax; retitling. Basically it’s a matter of using the same settings (no file inclusion, etc.) as PyPI and checking the URI schemes. One maintenance issue is the possible discrepancy between PyPI’s checks