[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Should be fixed now. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 13900edf13be by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.2': Forward port additional tests from 2.7 (issue #14829). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/13900edf13be New changeset 8c8709b98762 by Antoine Pitrou in branch 'default': Forward port additional tests fro

[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset e957b93571a8 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '2.7': Issue #14829: Fix bisect issues under 64-bit Windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e957b93571a8 -- ___ Python tracker

[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

Mark Dickinson added the comment: Curious; looks at first sight like some sort of confusion between Py_ssize_t and long types. -- ___ Python tracker ___ __

[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 888f5f3bfcb6 by Antoine Pitrou in branch '3.2': Issue #14829: Fix bisect and range() indexing with large indices (>= 2 ** 32) under 64-bit Windows. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/888f5f3bfcb6 New changeset a3784c8f165e by Antoine Pitrou in branc

[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Dates back to #10889. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: htt

[issue14829] test_bisect failure under 64-bit Windows

New submission from Antoine Pitrou : Shows that we lack such a buildbot... == FAIL: test_large_range (test.test_bisect.TestBisectC) -- Traceback (most recent ca