[issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available

2012-03-02 Thread STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor added the comment: The PEP 410 has been rejected, so I close the issue. -- resolution: -> wont fix status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available

2012-02-10 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis : -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscri

[issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available

2012-02-09 Thread Ross Lagerwall
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail

[issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available

2012-02-09 Thread STINNER Victor
New submission from STINNER Victor : With the PEP 410, it is possible to store timestamps with a resolution of 1 nanosecond. Python should use nanosleep() if the function is available for time.sleep(). This issue depends on issue #13882. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 153000 n

[issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available

2012-02-09 Thread STINNER Victor
Changes by STINNER Victor : -- dependencies: +PEP 410: Use decimal.Decimal type for timestamps ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-