[issue13479] pickle too picky on re-defined classes

Guido van Rossum added the comment: What you're seeing here is just one of may things that go subtly wrong when you reload a class. I don't think we should fix this one aspect while leaving so many other bugs due to the same root cause. It would be better to focus your energy on a way to imp

[issue13479] pickle too picky on re-defined classes

kxroberto added the comment: Well, "==" whould allow the wanted feature by exception through meta classes for concerned classes: >>> class X: ... a=1 ... >>> Y=X >>> class X: ... a=1 ... >>> Y==X False >>> class XCompare(type): ... def __eq__(self, other): ... print "

[issue13479] pickle too picky on re-defined classes

Guido van Rossum added the comment: Hm, this change allows many other *undesirable* objects pass the test as well. I'd prefer to stick to the rule, "when in doubt, raise an error". Maybe using == instead of 'is' as the test would be acceptable? -- nosy: +gvanrossum ___

[issue13479] pickle too picky on re-defined classes

Changes by kxroberto : -- title: pickle to picky on re-defined classes -> pickle too picky on re-defined classes ___ Python tracker ___ _