[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: While the work is appreciated, PEP 3108 is taking this in a different direction. -- resolution: -> out of date status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Brett, in consideration of PEP 3108... shouldn't we close this issue? The urilib module in the sandbox wasn't updated in the last seven months. Or we just keep this open as a reminder? (of what?) Thanks! -- nosy: +facundobatista _

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Brett Cannon added the comment: Yes, the modules should probably all get merged somehow. But discussing it in the web-sig is fine with me and I am happy to look at what the web-sig ends up recommending. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Christian Heimes added the comment: Please contact Brett Cannon. He organized the stdlib cleanup. -- assignee: -> brett.cannon nosy: +brett.cannon, tiran __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Changes by Alexandre Vassalotti: -- resolution: accepted -> __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Changes by Christian Heimes: -- keywords: +py3k priority: -> normal resolution: -> accepted __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Senthil added the comment: I have started this work at http://svn.python.org/projects/sandbox/trunk/urilib/ as a part of G-SoC, yes taking it to web-sig would be appropriate and I shall do so. techtonik, you might want to review it urilib and we can discuss it further. Thanks, -- nosy: +

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

Guido van Rossum added the comment: You missed urllib2 I think. :-) I agree it's a mess. I'm sure it all started out with backwards compatibility in mind. I find myself often importing cgi only to use the tiny function escape() that is defined there... I wonder if web-sig wouldn't be a good p

[issue1333] merge urllib and urlparse functionality

New submission from anatoly techtonik: The purpose is to encapsulate all URL handling functions in one module. At the moment there are three modules that dissect URLs for various bits of information. These are urlparse - to split url into components, urllib - to decode splitted data and cgi - to