[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

Changes by Yury Selivanov : -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

Larry Hastings added the comment: First: there's no chance this will go into 3.1, 3.2, or 3.3 at this point. Second: I can assure you that switching to the l... version of a function and not following the last symlink is exactly what "follow_symlinks" is for. Please see the 3.3 documentation

[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

Марк Коренберг added the comment: Отправлено с iPad 27.06.2012, в 6:03, Larry Hastings написал(а): No, follow symlinks is not the same. Skiplinks mean returning true or false depending on fact that last path element is symlink. Checking If symlink appear in the middle of the path, this is

[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

Larry Hastings added the comment: If this happens, in keeping with the new os module aesthetic, I suggest the prototype should be os.isdir(path, *, follow_symlinks=True) -- nosy: +larry ___ Python tracker __

[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' : -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http:

[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

Changes by Alexey Smirnov : -- nosy: +alexey-smirnov ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mai

[issue12971] os.isdir() should contain skiplinks=False in arguments

New submission from Марк Коренберг : When skiplinks is False (by default), it should as in current implementation, i.e. using stat(). if skiplinks is True, isidr() should use lstat() and same logick. If one will be implemented, os.walk() should be patched (see issue12970) to use this new isd