[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2014-06-26 Thread STINNER Victor
Changes by STINNER Victor : -- resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list U

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2014-06-26 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: Is it safe to assume that this test problem was resolved long ago? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ _

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-03 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Interesting. I wonder whether a reboot of the system would help (as it may have old semaphores hanging around). -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-03 Thread STINNER Victor
STINNER Victor added the comment: test_multiprocessing is still failing with "OSError: [Errno 23] Too many open files in system" on "x86 FreeBSD 7.2 3.x": http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/builders/x86%20FreeBSD%207.2%203.x/builds/1396/steps/test/logs/stdio I don't know the maximum number of

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-02 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Follow-up: I have disabled test_all_completed_some_already_completed in r87667, as I couldn't figure out why it hangs. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-02 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Thanks for the review, committed as r87665. Fixing flaky tests is fine, of course. -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-02 Thread Brian Quinlan
Brian Quinlan added the comment: The tests are currently flaky on Windows and I'd like to fix that before the release. But I don't have the bandwidth to debug the Call() abstraction used in the tests before 3.2 RC1. You can see the test change here: http://svn.python.org/view/python/branches/

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-02 Thread Martin v . Löwis
Martin v. Löwis added the comment: Is this really the time for restructuring tests? I think such activity should wait until after the 3.2 release. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2011-01-02 Thread Brian Quinlan
Brian Quinlan added the comment: Martin, Could you commit this patch if you think that it is the right thing? I'm going to be restructuring the tests and don't want you to get caught in merge hell. Cheers, Brian -- ___ Python tracker

[issue10798] test_concurrent_futures fails on FreeBSD

2010-12-30 Thread Martin v . Löwis
New submission from Martin v. Löwis : This is similar to #10348, but has a different scope; the attached patch disables the ProcessPoolExecutor if the system has too few POSIX semaphores. To keep support for the ThreadPoolExecutor, I had the test cases stop using multiprocessing.Event in the t