Savio Sena added the comment:
size_limits are not class attributes instead of instance attributes, as
suggested by giampaolo.rodola.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19790/issue1745035-101123-saviosena.diff
___
Python tracker
<h
Savio Sena added the comment:
Previous patch was incorrect. I'm attaching another one, I'm really sorry.
@giampaolo, about making the limits class attributes, it's not a good idea
IMHO. According to RFC1869 command sizes can change depending on which Service
Extension
Savio Sena added the comment:
Attaching a more concise patch, as requested by georg.brandl.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19787/issue1745035-101123-saviosena.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1745
Savio Sena added the comment:
The attached patch adopts the minimalistic approach described in previous post.
It pretends to implement Message Size Extension, defining a maximum message
data size to 32M bytes and maximum command length to 512 bytes.
In my opinion this is the best way to
Savio Sena added the comment:
The definite (and only?) solution would be to implement 'Message Size
Declaration[1]' Service Extension[2]. We can limit the size of commands and
text lines, but not the message size as a whole[3]. RFC1870 was created exactly
with the purpose of s
Changes by Savio Sena :
--
nosy: +saviosena
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1745035>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
