Rocco Santoro added the comment:
You are right. The documentation, that I know, is clear. Anyway in this case
"is" and "==" provides the same outcome and this is my remark, that I called
bug, wrongly. The reason is the nature of print(), as function, that always
remains
Rocco Santoro added the comment:
Thanks you very much for the explanations. I am sorry for bothering you,
actually my question concerned the use of identity operator. I suggest that
'==' means equal not identity. Therefore, it concerns the instance not the
ontology and makes a
New submission from Rocco Santoro :
Hi all
Why the identity operator and '==' are both applied to the type (see above)?
Is it not convenient to distinguish them? I mean the identity operator applied
to the type and '==' applied to the outcome.
Thanks for the attentio
