[issue31571] Redundand information on Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst

2017-09-25 Thread Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha
Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha added the comment: In that case, I believe the PR I've opened should be fine? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/is

[issue31571] Redundand information on Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst

2017-09-24 Thread Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha
Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha added the comment: Also, "Numeric literals" is a more general section, so rules that apply for the three types of numeric literals should probably go there to avoid repetition. Maybe the Integer, Floating point and Imaginary literal sections sho

[issue31571] Redundand information on Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst

2017-09-24 Thread Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha
Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha added the comment: I believe that the sentence regarding the - operator also applies to Integer literals and Imaginary literals. But it only appears on the Floating point literals and Numeric literals sections

[issue31571] Redundand information on Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst

2017-09-24 Thread Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha
New submission from Guilherme Praciano Karst Caminha: The file Doc/reference/lexical_analysis.rst has at least two redundant parts. The first one is quoted below: "As of Python 3.3 it is possible again to prefix string literals with a u prefix to simplify maintenance of dual 2.x an