[issue39685] Python 3.8 regression Socket operation on non-socket

2020-05-28 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: Consensus seems to be that this is a bug in sshuttle, not a bug in python. Thanks for the feedback. I think this bug can be closed now... -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue39

[issue39685] Python 3.8 regression Socket operation on non-socket

2020-02-18 Thread Brian May
New submission from Brian May : After upgrading to Python 3.8, users of sshuttle report seeing this error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "assembler.py", line 38, in File "sshuttle.server", line 298, in main File "/usr

[issue30181] Correct the parsing of a test case docstring.

2017-05-12 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: I have already created such a pull requests. It is bidirectionally linked to this ticket. However concerns have been raised that the automatic bot hasn't recognised that Ben Finney has signed the CLA. Hence it appears the pull request might be rejected.

[issue30181] Correct the parsing of a test case docstring.

2017-05-08 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: Me getting confused at the newline in the comparison output. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30181> ___ ___ Pytho

[issue30181] Correct the parsing of a test case docstring.

2017-05-08 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: I made an attempt at a PR. Unfortunately some of the tests appear to fail on some environments, and the messages produced don't exactly clarify why. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/is

[issue30181] Incorrect parsing of test case docstring

2017-04-26 Thread Brian May
Changes by Brian May : -- nosy: +brian ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue30181> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.pyth

[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

2011-08-21 Thread Brian May
Changes by Brian May : -- nosy: +ncoghlan ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6560> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

2011-06-05 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: To address some of the comments above: * Yes, the patch is large. However, most of this is in the tests. Only A relatively small part is in the code that implements the required functionality. I don't care much myself about the test cases, however would

[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

2011-05-30 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: Have tested my code with this patch, the recvmsg(...) call seems to work fine. Also had a half-hearted attempt at porting to Python 2.7, but didn't get past compiling, the code requires BEGIN_SELECT_LOOP and END_SELECT_LOOP macros that aren't defined

[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

2011-05-23 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: Hello, Are there any problems applying the v5 version of the patch to 3.3? Also is there any remote chance for a backport to 2.7? Thanks -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6

[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

2011-05-21 Thread Brian May
Brian May added the comment: What needs to happen to get recvmsg() supported in Python? recvmsg() is required to get get transparent UDP proxies working under Linux using tproxy, the code needs to run recvmsg() to be able to find out what the original destination address was for the the