On 4/10/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bit more than a year ago I blogged extensively about this. The only
> syntax that is acceptable to me is slightly different; the above would
> look like
>
> def fn(a: Seq, b: Index, c: Text = "default"): ...
>
> where Seq, Index and Text c
On 5/30/06, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still not convinced that
> 'lazy ' or your equivalent promise class are necessary or
> desireable for the evolution of Python; especially given the simplicity
> of the lambda solution.
I may be just seeing that I want to see, but by my re