On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:36 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to merge mailing lists, now that the design and first
> implementation of Python 3000 is complete. In particular, I would
+1
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr.
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is w
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html
> os.getcwdu() returns the current working directory as a bytes instance
getcwdb(), I suppose?
> New binary literals, e.g. 0b1010 (already in 2.6).
> Bytes literals are introduced with a leading b or B, and there is a new
> corresponding builti
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:36 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to merge mailing lists, now that the design and first
> implementation of Python 3000 is complete. In particular, I would
> like to merge the python-3000 mailing list back into python-dev,
> and the python-3
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 23:36, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to merge mailing lists, now that the design and first
> implementation of Python 3000 is complete. In particular, I would
> like to merge the python-3000 mailing list back into python-dev,
> and the python-300
2008/12/4 "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Any objections?
The timing is right, go for it.
Paul
___
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/o
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I would like to merge mailing lists, now that the design and first
> implementation of Python 3000 is complete. In particular, I would
+1
--
Dmitry Vasiliev (dima at hlabs.spb.ru)
http://hlabs.spb.ru
___
Python-3000 mailing l
> I like the general sentiment, but I think it may be a bad idea to
> automatically bring all the subscribers from the -3000 lists over to the
> more general lists. For instance if someone has an address subscribed
> specifically to archive the -3000 list suddenly it will begin archiving
> the othe
Good catches.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html
>
>> os.getcwdu() returns the current working directory as a bytes instance
>
> getcwdb(), I suppose?
>
>> New binary literals, e.g. 0b1010 (already in 2.6).
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> Good catches.
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html
>>
>>> os.getcwdu() returns the current working directory as a bytes instance
>>
>> getcwdb(), I suppose?
>>
>>> New binary
