On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:05:04 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:22:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
>> Try the current tip of the 4.13-maint branch without any additional
>> changes...
>
> I'm happy to report I have seen no more crashes. I'd appreciate a 4.13.2
> release, so I
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:22:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Try the current tip of the 4.13-maint branch without any additional
> changes...
I'm happy to report I have seen no more crashes. I'd appreciate a 4.13.2
release, so I have to deal with fewer calibre randomnly crashing bug reports.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:22:35PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Try the current tip of the 4.13-maint branch without any additional
> changes...
>
> hg pull -u
Done, albeit with hg clone -b 4.13-maint instead as pull wasn't doing the right
thing.
I'll let you know in a week if there are no mor
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:43:30 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> I was able to trace the python code that is triggering the assert.
>
> Basically, it is the following sequence:
>
> view = self.parent()
> At this point view is a subclass of QMainWindow and view.parent()
returns
> None
> Calling view.si
I was able to trace the python code that is triggering the assert.
Basically, it is the following sequence:
view = self.parent()
At this point view is a subclass of QMainWindow and view.parent() returns None
Calling view.size() causes the assert to be triggered. Interestingly the assert
is only
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:14:48PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Backout that change and apply the second one.
Doing that results in a crash, with the assertion causing the output
python2: objmap.c:267: add_object: Assertion `sw->flags & 0x0200 == 0' failed.
Backtrace attached.
Kovid.
--
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:20:26 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> Got another crash, with the addition of SIP_ALIAS. The backtrace is a
> little
> different, now the crash happens in PyObject__GcUntrack called from
> removeParent (backtrace attached).
>
> To be clear this is running off sip 4.13.1 release
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:05:39AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Yes, or the 4.13-maint branch...
>
> hg update 4.13-maint
>
> ...which (at the moment) are the same.
OK, done. You'll hear from me in a week if there are no
crashes, sooner otherwise.
Kovid.
--
__
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 12:42:13 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> I did, specifically to a checkout with hg:
>
> hg clone http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/hg/sip/ && grep -r SIP_ALIAS
> sip/
> destination directory: sip
> requesting all changes
> adding changesets
> adding manifests
> adding file changes
I did, specifically to a checkout with hg:
hg clone http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/hg/sip/ && grep -r SIP_ALIAS sip/
destination directory: sip
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1035 changesets with 2861 changes to 151 files (+7 heads)
updating
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:07:42 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:15:31PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
>> Then can you try the following change to add_object() in objmap.c...
>>
>> if (!(val->flags & SIP_SHARE_MAP))
>>
>> ...to...
>>
>> if (!(val->flags & (SIP_S
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:15:31PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> Then can you try the following change to add_object() in objmap.c...
>
> if (!(val->flags & SIP_SHARE_MAP))
>
> ...to...
>
> if (!(val->flags & (SIP_SHARE_MAP | SIP_ALIAS)))
>
> ...to see if it helps.
I was unable
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:18:13AM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:21:29 +0530, Kovid Goyal
> wrote:
> > Just got another crash, this time the backtrace had no itertools call.
> I've
> > attached the full backtrace for both crashes to this mail. How would you
> > like
> > me t
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:59:57 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> It's been a week and I have had no crashes since reverting sip to
revision
> 1027. While that is by no means conclusive proof of a bug, it is highly
> suggestive. Is there some extra instrumentation I can add to SIP to
narrow
> down
> the ca
It's been a week and I have had no crashes since reverting sip to revision
1027. While that is by no means conclusive proof of a bug, it is highly
suggestive. Is there some extra instrumentation I can add to SIP to narrow down
the cause?
Kovid.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:24:56PM +0530, Kovid Goya
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:32:49PM +, Phil Thompson wrote:
> The current version of SIP made some changes to the the mapping between
> Python and C++ objects. It might be worth trying a version without those
> changes. You would need to backout the changes up to and including...
>
> http://www
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:24:41PM +0100, Erik Janssens wrote:
> FYI, since PyQt 4.9 you don't need to disable the garbage
> collector any more.
>
> When Python desides to delete a Qt object from a different
> thread, PyQt delayes the deletion until that thread has
> taken control.
I know, I was
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:24:56 +0530, Kovid Goyal
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently started getting random segfaults in calibre on my dev
machine
> (linux 64bit sip-4.13.1 and PyQt4-4.9). I compiled everything with -ggdb
> and
> generated the following backtrace from a core dump (Only kept the top
18 matches
Mail list logo
