On Sunday 26 October 2008 12:48, lkcl wrote:
> jim, hi,
>
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172740
>
> the maintainers of the khtmlpart have agreed to add an enum to uniquely
> identify every single object derived from Node, which should help.
>
> are you _sure_ it's to do with twine - twine i
jim, hi,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172740
the maintainers of the khtmlpart have agreed to add an enum to uniquely
identify every single object derived from Node, which should help.
are you _sure_ it's to do with twine - twine is going to have to be
_seriously_ sophisticated, to under
David Boddie wrote:
>
> I don't think it was a problem in PyKDE3. At least, I don't remember
> running
> into any issues with casting - not with the DOM classes anyway. My brother
> wrote some convenience wrappers around the KHTML DOM, so I think I would
> have
> heard something if it had been
Jim Bublitz wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:21, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
>> the issue is that the wrapper objects aren't unique [don't return the
>> same python object for a given DOM c++ object], due to the underlying
>> c++ objects being typecast down to "Node*" (or Elem
On Tue Oct 14 23:34:29 BST 2008, Jim Bublitz wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:21, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > i cannot express enough how much _not_ fixing this makes khtml
> > completely unusable.
>
> There were DOM applications written for PyKDE3, which also didn't do any
> pro
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 14:21, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> folks, hi,
> thanks to some kind people on the kde-dev mailing list i'm posting
> here to describe an important design issue which makes the python
> khtml.DOM bindings completely unusable - for serious projects - unless
> it's
folks, hi,
thanks to some kind people on the kde-dev mailing list i'm posting
here to describe an important design issue which makes the python
khtml.DOM bindings completely unusable - for serious projects - unless
it's fixed.
the issue is that the wrapper objects aren't unique [don't return the
sa