On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 07:24 +0100, pyqt-requ...@riverbankcomputing.com
wrote:
> Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list PyQt
>
> We have received a request for the removal of your email address,
> "ro...@opq.se" from the pyqt@riverbankcomputing.com mailing list. To
> confirm tha
On Tuesday 11 September 2012, 15:23:31 Phil Thompson wrote:
> Hi Tony!
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:14:42 +0100, "Tony Lynch" wrote:
> > Phil has maintained PyQt uninterrupted for (I think) 8 or 9 years. He
> > tends to fix bugs within a day. Qt is much better than wx in general,
> > and more wid
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:14:42 +0100
"Tony Lynch" wrote:
> Qt is much better than wx in general, and more widely used. I'd go for
> Qt/PyQt every time,
One pro for wx might be using native toolkits and (probably) looking
better which is possible concern on Windows & Mac OS X platforms?
Sincerely
Hi Tony!
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:14:42 +0100, "Tony Lynch" wrote:
> Phil has maintained PyQt uninterrupted for (I think) 8 or 9 years. He
> tends to fix bugs within a day. Qt is much better than wx in general,
> and more widely used. I'd go for Qt/PyQt every time,
Actually it's coming up to the 1
Phil has maintained PyQt uninterrupted for (I think) 8 or 9 years. He
tends to fix bugs within a day. Qt is much better than wx in general,
and more widely used. I'd go for Qt/PyQt every time,
Regards
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: pyqt-boun...@riverbankcomputing.com [mailto:pyqt-
> bo
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:13:18 +0200
"Szabo, Patrick \(LNG-VIE\)" wrote:
> I have used both wyPython and PyQt and to be honest, at the time
> there wasn't much difference. PyQt is a little more powerfull but the
> syntax and "style" is imho almost the same.
Thanks.
> If you wan't to use Python
Well, if you are concerned by the one-man-show issue, then you should
go with PyQt because you should easily be able to write code that works
with both, PyQt and PySide.
My main concern is about graphics. I have to find a replacement for
PyQwt (not any longer maintained and only available for
I have used both wyPython and PyQt and to be honest, at the time there wasn't
much difference. PyQt is a little more powerfull but the syntax and "style" is
imho almost the same.
If you wan't to use Python3 you should use PyQt since wxPython has no stable
release for Python3 and is afaik disco
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:14:13 -0400
Doug Bell wrote:
Hopefully, you don't mind jumping into this (old) thread...
> Several years ago I wrote the same simple application in both
> toolkits. After that, it became obvious that PyQt was the way to go.
> The wx toolkit was not very friendly to use, rem
