I think that's the way to go, I didn't think that solution. I like it.
Thanks very much.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Phil Thompson
wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:49:30 -0400, Lic. José M. Rodriguez Bacallao
> wrote:
>> hi folks, I am creating a composite widget with PyQt4 and Dip, the
>> p
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:49:30 -0400, Lic. José M. Rodriguez Bacallao
wrote:
> hi folks, I am creating a composite widget with PyQt4 and Dip, the
> problem I have is that when I use dip properties for setting PyQt4
> properties in the constructor I am getting an error saying that the
> underlying C++
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:12:11 +0100, "Tony Lynch" wrote:
> Hi Phil
>
>
>
> I'm using SIP to wrap a large C++ library
I wonder which one that is... :)
> and am very impressed with the
> results so far - you've got an annotation for most of the use cases I'm
> interested in. However, I think I'
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 07:42:04 -0700, "Vivek Narvekar"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am trying to upgrade from SIP 3.3 to SIP 4.7.9.
>
> When I try running new sip.exe on all my older *.sip files, I get syntax
> error.
>
> Is there a lot of syntax change across these two versions ?
>
> Can I get
Hello,
I am trying to upgrade from SIP 3.3 to SIP 4.7.9.
When I try running new sip.exe on all my older *.sip files, I get syntax
error.
Is there a lot of syntax change across these two versions ?
Can I get some help document on the syntax which I should modify, if I
want to upgrade from SI
I think it would help if you could provide a working example of this bug.
Like a sip file which reproduces this behavior.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Tony Lynch wrote:
> Hi Phil
>
>
>
> I’m using SIP to wrap a large C++ library and am very impressed with the
> results so far – you’ve got an
Hi Phil
I'm using SIP to wrap a large C++ library and am very impressed with the
results so far - you've got an annotation for most of the use cases I'm
interested in. However, I think I've found a bug. I've copied in below
my own 'description to self' of the problem, if it is not sufficient fo