On 07.10.08 14:47:00, Daniel Miller wrote:
> Well, yes of course. Sorry for picking a bad example. How about
> QSplitter, QPushButton, QProgressBar, QPopumMenu, etc. Those are
> definitely used in many places, and the API for each of them changed. I
> realize this is not your fault--it was a d
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Sundance wrote:
> Henrik Pauli wrote:
> >> And we could have just as many Viper versions as we'd damn well
> >> please within any given Python and Qt release timeframe -- we'd
> >> simply import from Viper2, Viper3... rather than Viper.
> >
> > Hmmm, true that, but since
On Tue Oct 7 19:47:00 BST 2008, Daniel Miller wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
> > PyQt3 has always maintained backwards compatibility, so has PyQt4.
> > PyQt3 is not PyQt4. Likewise Qt3 is not Qt4. Granted, Trolltech
> > produced a Qt3=>Qt4 migration tool, but then they
On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Phil Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:10:57 -0400, Daniel Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- I am moving to PyQt4 because I need to use some of the new features
(the Graphics View Framework, for one). If I did not need these new
features in PyQt4 I'd be con
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:06:05 +0200, Giovanni Bajo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 10/7/2008 7:07 AM, Phil Thompson wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:30:49 -0500, "Arthur Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Doug Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Giovanni Baj
On 10/7/2008 5:10 PM, Daniel Miller wrote:
I should clarify a few things before I embark on a rebuttal:
- I have deployed my code to my end users many times since I started to
build my PyQt4 compatibility layer (it is not finished yet, and I can't
afford to stop pushing out bug fixes and new f
On 10/7/2008 12:25 PM, Doug Bell wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:29:12 -0700, Glenn Linderman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On approximately 10/6/2008 10:07 PM, came the following characters
from the keyboard of Phil Thompson:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:30:49 -0500, "Arthur Pemberto
On 10/7/2008 7:07 AM, Phil Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:30:49 -0500, "Arthur Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Doug Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
On 10/6/2008 7:27 PM, Joshua Kugler wrote:
Phil Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 3 Oct
I should clarify a few things before I embark on a rebuttal:
- I have deployed my code to my end users many times since I started
to build my PyQt4 compatibility layer (it is not finished yet, and I
can't afford to stop pushing out bug fixes and new features for a few
months while I do a re
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:20:13 +0200, Sundance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You also suggest the 'from PyQt4v2 import QtCore' and 'from PyQt4.v2
> import QtCore' schemes, in which, if I'm not mistaken, the '4' in PyQt4
> would now start referring to the Qt version, is that correct?
Yes - as (probab
Henrik Pauli wrote:
>> And we could have just as many Viper versions as we'd damn well
>> please within any given Python and Qt release timeframe -- we'd
>> simply import from Viper2, Viper3... rather than Viper.
>
> Hmmm, true that, but since Py2 and Py3 are completely different
> matters (as far
On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Phil Thompson wrote:
And we could have just as many Viper versions as we'd damn well
please
within any given Python and Qt release timeframe -- we'd simply
import
from Viper2, Viper3... rather than Viper.
Thoughts?
With 20/20 hindsight (starting 10 years ago)
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:25:59 -0400, Doug Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Thompson wrote:
>> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:29:12 -0700, Glenn Linderman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On approximately 10/6/2008 10:07 PM, came the following characters
>> > from the keyboard of Phil Thompson:
>> >>
Phil Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:29:12 -0700, Glenn Linderman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On approximately 10/6/2008 10:07 PM, came the following characters
> > from the keyboard of Phil Thompson:
> >> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:30:49 -0500, "Arthur Pemberton"
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:34:24 +0200, Sundance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Thompson wrote:
>
>> Regarding numbering, my current thinking is...
>>
>> from PyQt4 import QtCore2, QtGui2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to go out on a limb and share a few thoughts that came to
> me with you guys.
>
On Tuesday 07 October 2008, Sundance wrote:
> Phil Thompson wrote:
> > Regarding numbering, my current thinking is...
> >
> > from PyQt4 import QtCore2, QtGui2
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to go out on a limb and share a few thoughts that came to
> me with you guys.
>
> Essentially, the name of PyQ
Phil Thompson wrote:
> Regarding numbering, my current thinking is...
>
> from PyQt4 import QtCore2, QtGui2
Hi all,
I would like to go out on a limb and share a few thoughts that came to
me with you guys.
Essentially, the name of PyQt4 seems to carry some embedded confusion,
in particular ab
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:24:28 +0200, Mpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I don't want the cancel button to show up in my progress dialog. If you
> pass
> a 0 for the cancelButtonText in the constructor, the button should go
away.
> Here's what I do
>
> progress = QProgressDialog ('Render
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:29:12 -0700, Glenn Linderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On approximately 10/6/2008 10:07 PM, came the following characters from
> the keyboard of Phil Thompson:
>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:30:49 -0500, "Arthur Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 a
Dear all,
I don't want the cancel button to show up in my progress dialog. If you pass
a 0 for the cancelButtonText in the constructor, the button should go away.
Here's what I do
progress = QProgressDialog ('Rendering...', QString(0), 0, 100)
But the button still appears. Any clues on how to go
20 matches
Mail list logo
