[PyKDE] PyKDE Installation Problems

2003-07-30 Thread Christopher Lloyd
Hi, I am trying to install PyKDE 3.5-2 on a Mandrake 9.1 installation using KDE 3.1, Python 2.2, QT 3.1.1, gcc 3.2.2, sip 3.5, and PyQt 3.5. sip and PyQt installed fine. However when trying to run build.py for PyKDE, I get this output... Building PyKDE 3.5 for Python 2.2.2 on linux-i386. /usr/l

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Phil Thompson
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 4:43 pm, Greg Fortune wrote: > You can't be serious... There has *got* to be some kind of catch as my > licensing costs this last year ran over $3000. This seems like it's a > major oversight rather than a legal arrangment. I mean, how could TT > possibly agree to somet

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Greg Fortune
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 09:52, Peter Kropf wrote: > To start, we need Windows ia64, Linux ia64, Linux s390, Solaris Sparc 32 & > 64 bit, Solaris i686, AIX, HP-UX, Tru64 and OS X. Other Unix type platform > (like Irix) may be added in the future. Dang, I was feeling all special for supporting bot

RE: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Peter Kropf
Title: RE: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows To start, we need Windows ia64, Linux ia64, Linux s390, Solaris Sparc 32 & 64 bit, Solaris i686, AIX, HP-UX, Tru64 and OS X. Other Unix type platform (like Irix) may be added in the future. I'm not sure that asking our clients to obtain and build Qt GPL and

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Greg Fortune
What other platforms? AMD64? i386? You are limited to a certain extent by what platforms Qt supports... I guess the i386 could be a bit of an issue. Although, doesn't the developer license just apply to development? Couldn't I develop something on Linux i686 and then sell it to my clients who

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Greg Fortune
No, No, I didn't mean that at all. Someone, *please* tell him he's right ;o) Greg Fortune Fortune Solutions On Wednesday 30 July 2003 09:07, Ken Godee wrote: > That's how I understand it. > Have you looked at the BlackAdder product? > Someone, tell me I'm wrong. > Waiting

RE: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Peter Kropf
Title: RE: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows One issue that we have with BlackAdder is that it's available for Windows i686 and Linux i686 only. If we were to use BlackAdder, we'd still have to purchase Qt and PyQt to support the various other platforms that we need. And, we'd still have to find another

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Ken Godee
That's how I understand it. Have you looked at the BlackAdder product? Someone, tell me I'm wrong. Waiting > You can't be serious... There has *got* to be some kind of catch as my > licensing costs this last year ran over $3000. This seems like it's a major > oversi

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Greg Fortune
You can't be serious... There has *got* to be some kind of catch as my licensing costs this last year ran over $3000. This seems like it's a major oversight rather than a legal arrangment. I mean, how could TT possibly agree to something like that. Or Phil for that matter. Phil, is this som

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Ken Godee
> But we're talking about UI here, where it's all the little things than > count. Well, for me the difference seemed huge, and if I had the dow, > sure I'd get me the latest Qt for Win ... provided that was my preferred > platform to 'romance the snake'. > You're missing something here, which m

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Vio
QTextEdit. Now, keep in mind that I'm kind'a new on the PyQt scene. And I don't use Qt's network or db classes either, just the UI stuff. But anyways, my little code "essay" of last weekend was all essentially based on QTextEdit. Nowhere to be found on the free-QtWin install (now, installing on

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Michael Lauer
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 06.34 schrieb Vio: > I don't believe you can achieve what you want. Because the available > free-Qt-Win version is version 2.something (not 3.x !!), which is > missing A LOT of the more interesting Qt stuff. Where is that lot you are seeing? The major additions of Qt3 are n

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Phil Thompson
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 4:40 am, Keith Jones wrote: > Hi, > > I know this is for both PyQt and PyKDE, which implies it's linux > oriented, but I've got a question about distributing pyQt on windows. > I'm a linux user, and I've got a pyQt application that I would like a > friend (who's on windows

Re: [PyKDE] pyQt on windows

2003-07-30 Thread Vio
I don't believe you can achieve what you want. Because the available free-Qt-Win version is version 2.something (not 3.x !!), which is missing A LOT of the more interesting Qt stuff. I tried something like what you're suggesting this weekend, crossing the OS border, just for fun (luckily, I can