On 11/03 05:52, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> You're getting rid of mail_ssl_module rather than changing to dynamic,
> is that intentional?
The dynamic mail module includes all mail related modules. I probably
should have linked to the nginx announcement about dynamic modules
earlier, here it is now:
On 2016/11/03 18:02, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Jeremy Evans:
>
> > The four current FLAVORs get changed to subpackages, and the following
> > subpackages are added:
>
> There should be some upgrade path for pkg_add if you currently have
> one of the flavors installed.
>
> I wonder whether it
On 2016/11/03 07:10, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> The downside of this approach is to build nginx, you need to install
> all dependencies for all subpackages first.
That's the standard way we do things anyway, and most of these deps
aren't *all* that huge.
I agree with this approach.
> It that become
Jeremy Evans:
> The four current FLAVORs get changed to subpackages, and the following
> subpackages are added:
There should be some upgrade path for pkg_add if you currently have
one of the flavors installed.
I wonder whether it would make sense to declare the subpackage with
the corresponding
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:10:23AM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Here is a patch to the nginx port that changes it from using FLAVORs
> to using MULTI_PACKAGES, using the new dynamic module support in nginx.
>
> The four current FLAVORs get changed to subpackages, and the following
> subpackages ar
Here is a patch to the nginx port that changes it from using FLAVORs
to using MULTI_PACKAGES, using the new dynamic module support in nginx.
The four current FLAVORs get changed to subpackages, and the following
subpackages are added:
* image_filter
* geoip
* xslt
* stream
* perl
The advantage o
