On Nov 24, 2012, at 6:03 AM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'd like to remove www/firefox35 from the ports tree :
> - it's been EOL'ed upstream since 18 months, and thus receives no
> security updates. I have no idea if there are users of this port still
> a
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'd like to remove www/firefox35 from the ports tree :
> - it's been EOL'ed upstream since 18 months, and thus receives no
> security updates. I have no idea if there are users of this port still
&
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'd like to remove www/firefox35 from the ports tree :
> - it's been EOL'ed upstream since 18 months, and thus receives no
> security updates. I have no idea if there are users of this p
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 12:03:09PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i'd like to remove www/firefox35 from the ports tree :
> - it's been EOL'ed upstream since 18 months, and thus receives no
> security updates. I have no idea if there are users of this p
Hi,
i'd like to remove www/firefox35 from the ports tree :
- it's been EOL'ed upstream since 18 months, and thus receives no
security updates. I have no idea if there are users of this port still
around.
- it was originally kept in the tree because it was the only version
w
Same fix for firefox35
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /srv/boron/data/vcs/cvs/openbsd/ports/www/firefox35/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -p -r1.60 Makefile
--- Makefile2 Mar 2011 14:41:09 - 1.60
+++ Makefile
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:20:07PM -0400, Alex Libman wrote:
> Stable www/firefox35 couldn't fetch "firefox-3.5.10.source.tar.bz2" from
> locations specified in Makefile. I was able to download it from
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/3.5.10/source/ to distfile
Stable www/firefox35 couldn't fetch "firefox-3.5.10.source.tar.bz2" from
locations specified in Makefile. I was able to download it from
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/3.5.10/source/ to distfiles
and 'make install'ed OK.
Seems like they move older files after
On 05/21/10 12:21, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts
> > wrote:
> >> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 06:18:34PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts
> > wrote:
> >> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Kenneth Westerback
wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts
> wrote:
>> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
>> in the attic?
>
> Nope. 3.6 doesn't support Java plug-in.
how is that a negative? ;)
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:07 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
> in the attic?
>
> --
> The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org
>
>
Nope. 3.6 doesn't support Java plug-in.
. Ken
Since we have 3.6 is in www/mozilla-firefox should www/firefox35 be put
in the attic?
--
The OpenBSD Journal - http://www.undeadly.org
Howdy, all-
This patch corrects the path to README.OpenBSD in www/firefox35/pkg/MESSAGE
Best,
Kent
Index: pkg/MESSAGE
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/firefox35/pkg/MESSAGE,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -u pkg/MESSAGE
--- pkg
On 2009/12/18 14:20, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Christian Weisgerber
> wrote:
> > I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
> > of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
> > distinfo up
On 2009/12/18 22:36, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
> of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
> distinfo update. *Except* that it wants sqlite 3.6.16.1 or better
> and our sqlite port is at
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Christian Weisgerber
wrote:
> I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
> of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
> distinfo update. *Except* that it wants sqlite 3.6.16.1 or better
> and our sqlite
I would like to update www/firefox35 to 3.5.6 for the latest round
of security fixes. There's nothing to it, version number and
distinfo update. *Except* that it wants sqlite 3.6.16.1 or better
and our sqlite port is at 3.6.16. I can't find a distfile for
3.6.16.1 and sthen@ says
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Benoit Lecocq wrote:
> Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> This is a provisional update for www/firefox35 to 3.5.5, which fixes
>> numerous security issues.
>>
>> Maybe I should bump SO_VERSION.
>>
>> I had to disable the (minima
Whoops, firefox35 also requries sqlite3-3.6.16 now.. perhaps that should
be updated in the Makefile.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/firefox35/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u Makefile
--- Makefile27 Nov
Hi,
I have been running 3.5.4 on 4.6 for a few weeks, I hadn't updated to
3.5.5 yet.
Is there any reason that www/firefox35 uses it's own nss/nspr still? the
versions in the ports tree appear to be the latest.
Also, out of curiosity.. will -STABLE ports/packages exist for either
fi
Brad:
> > I had to disable the (minimal) use of thread-local storage that has
> > been introduced since 3.5.3. I don't know if this is even supposed
> > to work with our compiler and toolchain.
>
> OpenBSD does not have TLS support yet, so I'd say this does not work on
> OpenBSD yet.
Indeed.
On Friday 27 November 2009 08:03:42 Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> I had to disable the (minimal) use of thread-local storage that has
> been introduced since 3.5.3. I don't know if this is even supposed
> to work with our compiler and toolchain.
OpenBSD does not have TLS support yet, so I'd say t
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> This is a provisional update for www/firefox35 to 3.5.5, which fixes
> numerous security issues.
>
> Maybe I should bump SO_VERSION.
>
> I had to disable the (minimal) use of thread-local storage that has
> been introduced since 3.5.3. I don&#
On 2009/11/27 14:03, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> This is a provisional update for www/firefox35 to 3.5.5, which fixes
> numerous security issues.
Works fine here on amd64, building on i386 now, I don't have anything
else which can really run firefox..
> Maybe I should bump SO_V
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:03:42 +0100
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> This is a provisional update for www/firefox35 to 3.5.5, which fixes
> numerous security issues.
Works for me on amd64.
- Robert
This is a provisional update for www/firefox35 to 3.5.5, which fixes
numerous security issues.
Maybe I should bump SO_VERSION.
I had to disable the (minimal) use of thread-local storage that has
been introduced since 3.5.3. I don't know if this is even supposed
to work with our compile
Mozilla 3.5 seems quite unstable.
It crashes on Windows XP too.
> It crashes for me too, on CURRENT i386
>
> can anyone confirm if this is a FreeBSD only bug?
>
> eg does it crash in Linux or in OSX?
>
>
> Sam Fourman Jr.
>
>
On 03.07.2009, at 07:31, David Coppa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr.
wrote:
eg does it crash in Linux or in OSX?
Does not crash in Linux (tested just now on latest Ubuntu @ my
employer)
Neither under OSX
regards
Karl-Heinz
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryp
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> eg does it crash in Linux or in OSX?
Does not crash in Linux (tested just now on latest Ubuntu @ my employer)
cheers,
David
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>
>> It crashes for me too, on CURRENT i386
>> can anyone confirm if this is a FreeBSD only bug?
>
> An OpenBSD list is probably a bad place to ask this.
My bad, there is a similar thread on a FreeBSD list,
I jus
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> It crashes for me too, on CURRENT i386
> can anyone confirm if this is a FreeBSD only bug?
An OpenBSD list is probably a bad place to ask this.
(It crashes on FreeBSD unless you have POSIX 1003.1b semaphores in
your kernel. kldload sem.)
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerb
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Aaron Stellman a écrit :
>>
>> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
>> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
>> page with such element.
>> example page on which it crashes:
>> http://www.double.c
Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
> page with such element.
Yes, it does.
Note that the firefox35 port is not for general use. It is for
people who want to find (and maybe even fix
On Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 01:47:42AM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
>> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
>> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
>> page with such element.
>> example page on which
Gilles Chehade a écrit :
Aaron Stellman a écrit :
Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
page with such element.
example page on which it crashes:
http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
Can anyone else co
Aaron Stellman a écrit :
Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
page with such element.
example page on which it crashes:
http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
Can anyone else confirm such behavior?
y
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
> supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
> page with such element.
> example page on which it crashes:
> http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
>
> Can
Built firefox35-3.5 on -amd64 current. Supposedly firefox35
supports the new html5 element. However, firefox crashes on a
page with such element.
example page on which it crashes:
http://www.double.co.nz/video_test/test1.html
Can anyone else confirm such behavior?
40 matches
Mail list logo
