Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-24 Thread Marc Balmer
* frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:10:52AM +0200, Marc Balmer said that > > I am still contending that having the version in the name stem would > > be the best solution: instead of py-whatever (for the current default > > python) and py-whatever-python24 (for python2.4) it

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-24 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:10:52AM +0200, Marc Balmer said that > I am still contending that having the version in the name stem would > be the best solution: instead of py-whatever (for the current default > python) and py-whatever-python24 (for python2.4) it would be py25-whatever, > py24-w

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-20 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Will Maier wrote: > +1; I think this is the most sane approach. +2 -- Antoine

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-20 Thread Will Maier
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:10:52AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote: > I am still contending that having the version in the name stem > would be the best solution: instead of py-whatever (for the > current default python) and py-whatever-python24 (for python2.4) > it would be py25-whatever, py24-whatever

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-19 Thread Marc Balmer
* Damien Miller wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a work-in-progress port of Python-3.0rc1. It builds, > packages and runs on i386 (at least), but at least one regress test > hangs. You will need to be running fairly -current for this - a few bugs > in libc and elsewhere were shown up by the python reg

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-19 Thread Damien Miller
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Ian Darwin wrote: > > > How we deal with python libraries needs work anyway - it would be > > much nicer if we could parallel install the same library targetted > > at different python versions and have the package system play nice. > > Python supports this fine but unfortunat

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-19 Thread Brandon Mercer
Just built it on i386. Will run it for a few weeks and see what we come up with. Thanks! Brandon On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How we deal with python libraries needs work anyway - it would be >> much nicer if we could parallel install the same libra

Re: work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-19 Thread Ian Darwin
How we deal with python libraries needs work anyway - it would be much nicer if we could parallel install the same library targetted at different python versions and have the package system play nice. Python supports this fine but unfortunately I haven't figured out the right incantations to sup

work-in-progress: python-3.0rc1

2008-10-19 Thread Damien Miller
Hi, Attached is a work-in-progress port of Python-3.0rc1. It builds, packages and runs on i386 (at least), but at least one regress test hangs. You will need to be running fairly -current for this - a few bugs in libc and elsewhere were shown up by the python regress tests (and subsequently fixed)