Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 09:45:24PM +0300, Maksim Rodin a écrit :
> > > > Hello,
> > > > I noticed that I cannot attach files with non ascii symbols in filename
> > > > using sogo webmail.
> > > > There is an entry in /var/log/sogo/sogo.log:
> > &g
Le Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 10:35:16AM +0100, Sebastian Reitenbach a écrit :
> Hey,
>
> I was looking on how to get that passed on via "defaults", but no way, then
> had some "ugly"
> way using rc_pre in the rc script. @landry thanks for pointing to the
> login.conf and Maksim
> for bringing up the
dme
>
> On Wed Feb 1 10:31:56 2023, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 09:45:24PM +0300, Maksim Rodin a écrit :
> > > Hello,
> > > I noticed that I cannot attach files with non ascii symbols in filename
> > > using sogo
> I noticed that I cannot attach files with non ascii symbols in filename
> > using sogo webmail.
> > There is an entry in /var/log/sogo/sogo.log:
> > sogod[82818:12065535212040] EXCEPTION:
> > NAME:NSCharacterConversionException REASON:Can't get cString from Un
Le Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 09:45:24PM +0300, Maksim Rodin a écrit :
> Hello,
> I noticed that I cannot attach files with non ascii symbols in filename using
> sogo webmail.
> There is an entry in /var/log/sogo/sogo.log:
> sogod[82818:12065535212040] EXCEPTION:
> NAME:NSCharacterC
Hello,
I noticed that I cannot attach files with non ascii symbols in filename using
sogo webmail.
There is an entry in /var/log/sogo/sogo.log:
sogod[82818:12065535212040] EXCEPTION:
NAME:NSCharacterConversionException REASON:Can't get cString from Unicode
string. INFO:(null)
After
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:33:30 +0100 Jan Stary wrote:
> What do people use as a light-weight webmail
Base ssh & packaged mutt. (Works fine with PuTTY on Widows, etc.)
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
On 22.01.2018 17:33, Jan Stary wrote:
What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd?
Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox?
Thanks,
Jan
I use RoundCube as the web interface to the Dovecot IMAP server.
OpenSMTPD delivers the mails using
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:29:25AM +0100, Sol??ne Rapenne wrote:
> Le 2018-01-22 17:33, Jan Stary a ??crit??:
> > What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd?
> > Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
Le 2018-01-22 17:33, Jan Stary a écrit :
What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd?
Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox?
Thanks,
Jan
Hello,
You can try https://www.mailpile.is/ it's a webmail
intended to be used by only one p
On Tue, January 23, 2018 03:00, trondd wrote:
> On Mon, January 22, 2018 3:02 pm, Thuban wrote:
>>
>> I also like the old style of squirrelmail, not packaged under OpenBSd
>> but who might work.
>>
>
> It does. That is what I currently use with www/links+ for a nice
> javascript free interface.
>
On Mon, January 22, 2018 3:02 pm, Thuban wrote:
>
> I also like the old style of squirrelmail, not packaged under OpenBSd
> but who might work.
>
It does. That is what I currently use with www/links+ for a nice
javascript free interface.
Hasn't been a release in many years and I'm not sure if it
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 07:06:48PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/01/22 19:03, Thuban wrote:
> > rainloop.
> >
>
> It looks nice and is easy to setup. They seem vey fond of md5
> though, even with the per-server salt they use md5 has not really been
> good enough for some time. And
There was prayer webmail, but doesn't seem available anymore. That was
the previous URL :
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~dpc22/prayer/
(used to be mentionned by suckless people :
https://lists.suckless.org/wiki/1506/1847.html)
I also like the old style of squirrelmail, not packaged
On 2018/01/22 19:03, Thuban wrote:
> rainloop.
>
It looks nice and is easy to setup. They seem vey fond of md5
though, even with the per-server salt they use md5 has not really been
good enough for some time. And they haven't learned about not including
config directories under the web root..
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:19:36 +0100
Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> custom webmail, not quite ready to be used by others.
>
but you will release it to the public at some point, right?? That would
be fantastic - a webmail client made by the same people that created
opensmtpd. That is
rainloop.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:33:30PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd?
>
custom webmail, not quite ready to be used by others.
> Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox?
>
nope, it can store in Maildir or mbox, what
What do people use as a light-weight webmail above smtpd?
Does smptd need to store in Maildirs as opposed to mbox?
Thanks,
Jan
hmm, on Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 08:05:07PM +1000, Rod Whitworth said that
> Does anybody know what combination works well with nothing as silly as
> mismatched db versions? Maybe there is a way to get Roundcube (the
postfix/dovecot/openwebmail
postfix talks directly to dovecot, it's a breeze.
(debug
-IMAP webmail. A few
of the things that I like about this solution are:
- it is written entirely in perl (no php or other non-base prereqs)
- it works well when deployed on the mail server or over POP3
- its interface is very clean yet fairly feature rich
- it is browser agnostic and renders
On 2009/07/04 12:27, tico wrote:
> I'm a big fan of Cyrus. Not because it's always the easiest to set
> up, or because the documentation is retard-proof, but because it's
> ridiculously scalable, and I've used it for many years without it
> ever disappointing me. The more difficult (though flexible
t of course) wants webmail.
>
> I went hunting. About the only webmail server I found that did not need
> an imapd was sqwebmail and we don't have a port for that. Yes, I could
> have a crack at making a port but that, given a lng absence from C
> for me and also that it doesn
candidate.
I haven't found any "perfect" webmail but Roundcube looks nice, is
easy to get running and works _reasonably_ well. ;)
I agree on the looks. Non-techy customers tend to be very "itchy" if
they find a mild snag in an "ugly" product. Not
candidate.
I haven't found any "perfect" webmail but Roundcube looks nice, is
easy to get running and works _reasonably_ well. ;)
I agree on the looks. Non-techy customers tend to be very "itchy" if
they find a mild snag in an "ugly" product. Not so h
ndidate.
>
>I haven't found any "perfect" webmail but Roundcube looks nice, is
>easy to get running and works _reasonably_ well. ;)
I agree on the looks. Non-techy customers tend to be very "itchy" if
they find a mild snag in an "ugly" product. Not
On Jul 4, 2009, at 6:05 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
So looking at others needing imap showed me RoundCube. Pretty snazzy
looks, renders all that fancy junk that seems to be all the go now and
we have a package for it.
Vote +1 for Roundcube webmail.
So which imap? Dovecot looked like a
On 2009/07/04 20:05, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> So which imap? Dovecot looked like a candidate. It can use sqlite as
> does Roundcube and I know it can do authentication for Postfix so it
> looked like a suitable candidate.
I haven't found any "perfect" webmail but Roundcub
I have been running email for a couple of small domains for a few years
using Postfix and Teapop on OpenBSD. No complaints.
I have scripted user addition with passwords etc etc.
Now somebody (important of course) wants webmail.
I went hunting. About the only webmail server I found that did not
Dear Webmail User,
A Computer Database Maintainance is currently going on. This Message is
Very Important. We are very concerned with stopping the proliferation of
spam. We have implemented Sender Address Verification (SAV) to ensure that
we do not receive unwanted email and to give
Yeah, Sorry about that.. I didn't understand that webmail was in fact
a collection of existing packages.
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/9/06, Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Selon "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I Know OpenBSD has a Policy of n
Selon "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I Know OpenBSD has a Policy of not putting pre release (Stable)
> software in the ports tree, so I was wondering if anyone has a package
> for HordeWebmail?
You mean like
$ cd /usr/ports/ && make search name=horde
Port: horde-3.1.3
Path: devel/ho
I Know OpenBSD has a Policy of not putting pre release (Stable)
software in the ports tree, so I was wondering if anyone has a package
for HordeWebmail?
it looks pretty interesting, i wonder how secure it actually is :)
does anyone have any experience with it?
http://www.horde.org/webmail
33 matches
Mail list logo
