On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 02:23:11PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024/10/05 17:22, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > Updating to 69.5.1 seems simpler (I fixed persistent breakage in a
> > > couple of ports) and at least gets us beyond the current patches.
> > I saw no fallout in an amd64 bulk. I can
On 2024/10/05 17:22, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > Updating to 69.5.1 seems simpler (I fixed persistent breakage in a
> > couple of ports) and at least gets us beyond the current patches.
>
> I saw no fallout in an amd64 bulk. I can't recall having seen this
> spidermonkey issue ever.
>
> ok tb
Thanks
> Updating to 69.5.1 seems simpler (I fixed persistent breakage in a
> couple of ports) and at least gets us beyond the current patches.
I saw no fallout in an amd64 bulk. I can't recall having seen this
spidermonkey issue ever.
ok tb
We're starting to build up a few patches to cope with old setuptools
(archivers/py-zstandard wants >=69, devel/py-constantly wants >=68.2,
net/py-msgpack wants >=69.5.1).
Testing the current version (75.1.0) in bulk on i386 there's a fair bit
of breakage, and from memory last time I tried updating
