On Mon, 26 Aug 2024, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Any reason not to go for 1.9.0? I've had that locally for a while but
> didn't get round to committing it.
>
No issues from my end. Thanks!
Any reason not to go for 1.9.0? I've had that locally for a while but
didn't get round to committing it.
On 2024/08/25 12:02, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> A newer version of poetry core is needed for a new port, test-celery which
> is needed for another new port (celery - a distributed task queue), wh
A newer version of poetry core is needed for a new port, test-celery which
is needed for another new port (celery - a distributed task queue), which
is eventually going to be needed to import apache superset.
I've tested that the 40-50 reverse deps all build with the below and that
poetry-core
