update to 1.3.7; tested on i386/amd64/sparc64.
comments, ok's?
cheers,
okan
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/GraphicsMagick/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 Makefile
--- Makefile1 Sep 2009 1
> GraphicsMagick update to 1.3.3:
> http://www.demirmen.com/~okan/GraphicsMagick-1.3.3.diff
Great work, thanks!
>
> koffice bit with kili's patch for GM 1.3.3:
> http://www.demirmen.com/~okan/koffice-GM-1.3.3.diff
>
> While we've found no regressions so far, neither of us are
> KDE/koffice users;
GraphicsMagick update to 1.3.3:
http://www.demirmen.com/~okan/GraphicsMagick-1.3.3.diff
koffice bit with kili's patch for GM 1.3.3:
http://www.demirmen.com/~okan/koffice-GM-1.3.3.diff
While we've found no regressions so far, neither of us are KDE/koffice
users; please test and comment - Thanks.
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:21:51PM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > > Fix koffice to work with latest GraphicsMagick?
> >
> > Please do.
[...]
> i'm not interested in krita, nor do i have the time to invest in it
> right now. of course, others are more than welcome to do so :)
Untested (I don't e
On Wed 2008.12.03 at 16:41 +0100, L?VAI D?niel wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2008 03.41.51 Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > seems i've missed a bit here while away...
> >
> > 2 things:
> >
> > koffice 1.6 branch does not support newer GraphicsMagick versions.
> >
> > i still don't understand the no_gs th
On Thu 2008.12.04 at 18:26 -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2008 18:16:32 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:41:04PM +0100, L?VAI D?niel wrote:
> > > > at least we don't break the current koffice3, for now.
> > >
> > > Now I really think we should go down the road you
On Thursday 04 December 2008 18:16:32 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:41:04PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > at least we don't break the current koffice3, for now.
> >
> > Now I really think we should go down the road you have proposed earlier:
> > Making a 1.1.x/ dir for main
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 04:41:04PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > at least we don't break the current koffice3, for now.
> Now I really think we should go down the road you have proposed earlier:
> Making a 1.1.x/ dir for mainting compatibility with koffice 1.6, and a
> 1.3.x for the latest stable
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 03.41.51 Okan Demirmen wrote:
> seems i've missed a bit here while away...
>
> 2 things:
>
> koffice 1.6 branch does not support newer GraphicsMagick versions.
>
> i still don't understand the no_gs thing. as kili pointed out, it
> can be pinned down to removing the run
seems i've missed a bit here while away...
2 things:
koffice 1.6 branch does not support newer GraphicsMagick versions.
i still don't understand the no_gs thing. as kili pointed out, it can
be pinned down to removing the run dependency of ghostscript, but why?
for example, GraphicsMagick suppor
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:10:16PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
No. All you need is a global
BUILD_DEPENDS= :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu
regardless of no_x11 or not. The whole purpose of this dependency
is to always get the same delegates.mgk that uses pnm
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:10:16PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > No. All you need is a global
> >
> > BUILD_DEPENDS= :ghostscript-*:print/ghostscript/gnu
> >
> > regardless of no_x11 or not. The whole purpose of this dependency
> > is to always get the same delegates.mgk that uses pnmraw
On Sunday 30 November 2008 19.22.22 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 02:18:26PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > After a closer look at configure.ac and at the source trees after
> > > make configure (with ghostscript installed and uninstalled), I
> > > think you really don't need t
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 02:18:26PM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > After a closer look at configure.ac and at the source trees after
> > make configure (with ghostscript installed and uninstalled), I think
> > you really don't need the no_gs flavor. The only relevant part that
> > of GraphicsMagick
On Sunday 30 November 2008 12.59.51 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:30:06AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > > Then the port now is broken, because no matter what,
> > > > GraphicsMagick picks up ghostscript. So keeping "CONFIGURE_ARGS
> > > > +=
> > > > --without-gslib" only ma
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:30:06AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > Then the port now is broken, because no matter what, GraphicsMagick
> > > picks up ghostscript. So keeping "CONFIGURE_ARGS +=
> > > --without-gslib" only matters if we also remove the
> > > BUILD_DEPENDS+=
> > > :ghostscrip
On Sunday 30 November 2008 11.08.25 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:35:17AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > > FYI: only the gtk flavor of ghostscript contains libgs, so a
> > > GraphicsMagick flavor depending on libgs (i.e. --with-gslib)
> > > would have to explicitely depend on
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 09:35:17AM +0100, LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> > FYI: only the gtk flavor of ghostscript contains libgs, so a
> > GraphicsMagick flavor depending on libgs (i.e. --with-gslib) would
> > have to explicitely depend on ghostscript's gtk flavor.
> >
> > So, please just keep the CONFIGUR
On Saturday 29 November 2008 22.36.56 Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:08:12AM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > Oh, and I see that GraphicsMagick doesn't recommend gslib, so maybe
> > we should just disable that by default instead of making it a
> > FLAVOR;
>
> FYI: only the gtk f
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:08:12AM -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> Oh, and I see that GraphicsMagick doesn't recommend gslib, so maybe we
> should just disable that by default instead of making it a FLAVOR;
FYI: only the gtk flavor of ghostscript contains libgs, so a
GraphicsMagick flavor depending
On Saturday 29 November 2008 16.08.12 Okan Demirmen wrote:
> One major issue/reason for keeping the current GraphicsMagick is
> koffice3. I'm not sure we can simply drop the filter that is
> dependent on the old GraphicsMagick - I've looked into it some, but
> not enough; and koffice3 isn't going
On Sat 2008.11.29 at 11:39 +0100, L?VAI D?niel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It [1] is basically Okan's patch (sorry, but i only found your post
> recently); I've changed VERSION from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6, and added a no_gs
> FLAVOR. Also note, that now if one builds it with x11 (ie. not
> specifing FLAVOR=no_x11
Hi!
It [1] is basically Okan's patch (sorry, but i only found your post
recently); I've changed VERSION from 1.2.5 to 1.2.6, and added a no_gs
FLAVOR. Also note, that now if one builds it with x11 (ie. not
specifing FLAVOR=no_x11) it depends on graphics/libwmf, and will
automatically pick up g
long overdue update to 1.2.5 with a bit of a re-work.
comments and such are welcome.
cheers,
okan
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/graphics/GraphicsMagick/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Makefile
--- Make
24 matches
Mail list logo
