Hello,
there was some traffic on the urwid mailing list recently, so I checked
out the version we have versus upstream and we are behind.
I prepared and inlined an update from 2.0.1 to 2.5.2.
Previous art, sthen@ update 2.0.1 -> 2.3.4, 2023-12-29:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=17
Hi, while testing an update to net/toot I noticed that py-urwid was
a bit behind, ok for this?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-urwid/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -p -r1.38 Makefile
--- Makefile26 N
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:18:07PM +0100, clematis wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:55:47PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2020/01/06 09:42, clematis wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:13:04AM +0100, clematis wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:18:45PM +, Stuart Henderson w
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 12:55:47PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020/01/06 09:42, clematis wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:13:04AM +0100, clematis wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:18:45PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > diff -u, please.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Please find d
On 2020/01/06 09:42, clematis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:13:04AM +0100, clematis wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:18:45PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > diff -u, please.
> > >
> >
> > Please find diff -u attached.
> > Cheers,
>
> ping?
> Diff: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-por
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:13:04AM +0100, clematis wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:18:45PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > diff -u, please.
> >
>
> Please find diff -u attached.
> Cheers,
ping?
Diff: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=157492525529846&q=p3
--
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:18:45PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> diff -u, please.
>
Please find diff -u attached.
Cheers,
--
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)
? diff_py-urwid-2.1.0
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-ur
diff -u, please.
On 2019/11/27 21:56, clematis wrote:
> Hi Team,
> Version bump from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0.
> build/run OK on amd64.
> tests results are similar for py3 compared to previous version. improved
> in py2 with all tests completing successfuly.
> comments? ok?
> Thanks.
> --
> clematis (0x7
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 09:56:33PM +0100, clematis wrote:
> Hi Team,
> Version bump from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0.
> build/run OK on amd64.
> tests results are similar for py3 compared to previous version. improved
> in py2 with all tests completing successfuly.
> comments? ok?
> Thanks.
Oops looks like I'
Hi Team,
Version bump from 2.0.1 to 2.1.0.
build/run OK on amd64.
tests results are similar for py3 compared to previous version. improved
in py2 with all tests completing successfuly.
comments? ok?
Thanks.
--
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)
? py-urwid-2.1.0
Index: Makefile
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 08:50:26PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> How did you get these results?
>
> $ export FLAVOR=python3
> $ make test
> ...
> Ran 296 tests in 4.156s
>
> FAILED (failures=1, errors=4)
> Test failed: failures=1>
> ...
>
> See my full
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 06:00:40PM +0200, clematis wrote:
> Yes. It's a little bit noisy. A few depreciation since Python 3.0
>
> platform openbsd6 -- Python 2.7.16, pytest-4.4.0, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.11.0
> 30 failed, 153 passed
> platform openbsd6 -- Python 3.7.4, pytest-4.4.0, py-1.8.0, pluggy-0.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 06:00:40PM +0200, clematis wrote:
> Tested with one, productivity/khal, built, installed and ran OK.
Thanks.
> Note for those who might have manually installed via pip some of these
> deps (as root) I would recommand to pip uninstall them before so they are
> all properly
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 01:25:37PM +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Did you test the existing users of this port?
Tested with one, productivity/khal, built, installed and ran OK.
Note for those who might have manually installed via pip some of these
deps (as root) I would recommand to pip uninstall
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:31:20PM +0200, clematis wrote:
> Here's a quick update for devel/py-urwid from 1.3.1 to 2.0.1
> Build and run ok on amd64 (as dep of upcoming net/toot update).
Thanks for looking into this.
Did you test the existing users of this port?
Did you run the regress suite (for
Hi Team,
Here's a quick update for devel/py-urwid from 1.3.1 to 2.0.1
Build and run ok on amd64 (as dep of upcoming net/toot update).
Comments? OK?
Thanks,
--
clematis (0x7e96fd2400fe7b59)
? diff-devel_py-urwid
Index: Makefile
===
RCS
Hi,
this is the diff to update devel/py-urwid to 1.0.0.
I need this update for hgview, a new port I'm working on.
Are you ok?
Regards,
--
Remi
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/py-urwid/Makefile,v
retrieving rev
17 matches
Mail list logo
