> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:36:32PM -0400, Alex Libman wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps down the road it might make sense to use additional "flavors" to
> > simplify disabling those? I think a lot of OpenBSD users, particularly
> > those who choose Fossil, might be trying to reduce their dependencies on
>
My bad for making it sound as if it installed tcl by default, I was
mostly speaking in generalities. Thank you once again for the work you
do on the ports.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:51:41 -0400, "James Turner" said:
> You are correct, gnupg is not required, if it's installed however you
> can use i
You are correct, gnupg is not required, if it's installed however you
can use it to sign your commits. Also why comment out REGRESS_DEPENDS?
tcl shouldn't get installed unless you run make regress if I'm not
mistaken. A normal user running make install or pkg_add will never get
tcl installed.
On T
Thank you for the update, James.
FYI, I comment out the following Makefile lines to reduce dependencies,
and it seems to work fine (4.7-stable):
# MODULES = lang/tcl
# RUN_DEPENDS = :gnupg-*:security/gnupg
# REGRESS_DEPENDS = ${MODTCL_RUN_DEPENDS}
# do-regress:
#
Update to fossil tested on i386.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/fossil/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 Makefile
--- Makefile21 Sep 2010 21:59:09 - 1.12
+++ Makefile5 Oct 2010 22:58
