On 2024/03/09 10:15:55 +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2024/02/25 14:06:27 +, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
> > Bump.
>
> pinging again
i've imported it with ok rsadowski, thanks :-)
On 2024/02/25 14:06:27 +, Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
> Bump.
pinging again
I'm reattaching the tarballs. I made a small edit in docker-compose and
buildx to switch back to GH_*: go.port.mk has some special casing for it
and none for DIST_TUPLE and until someone brave enough will take a loo
Greetings,
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 19:22:06 +0100,
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
>
> So, we agree for this latest version? buildx as an RDEP, no package name
> changes.
Any chance that this will be part of 7.5?
I run it locally and it work quite well.
--
wbr, Kirill
Bump.
diff 66558c8aa9d546289d58e8d8fc876f4ab52fa9a4
66ce938ebaa602aed50c9ed8f7db88b7b1755fe2
commit - 66558c8aa9d546289d58e8d8fc876f4ab52fa9a4
commit + 66ce938ebaa602aed50c9ed8f7db88b7b1755fe2
blob - c4725a9ecd19f3cc5192e1e9b814278f053891f5
blob + cc9fc7a65e6a88b303d359fb397c74379c176d13
--- sysu
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 19:22:06 +0100,
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
>
> So, we agree for this latest version? buildx as an RDEP, no package name
> changes.
ok for the version in the email, it seems clear and expected.
--
wbr, Kirill
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:10:37PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 18:53:26 +0100,
> Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
> >
> > Based on the deprecation, I believe it makes a lot of sense to make
> > docker-buildx a RDEP of docker-cli.
> >
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Questio
Hi Lucas,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 18:53:26 +0100,
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
>
> Based on the deprecation, I believe it makes a lot of sense to make
> docker-buildx a RDEP of docker-cli.
>
Agreed.
> Question: given that Docker names buildx and compose as plugins in their
> docs, like `docker-{buil
Hi Kyrill, Omar,
Got around to test all the ports and they work great. Thanks for taking
the time for porting docker-compose too. I wanted to do that for some
time already.
Based on the deprecation, I believe it makes a lot of sense to make
docker-buildx a RDEP of docker-cli.
The versions aren't
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:47:23 +0100,
Omar Polo wrote:
>
> Ah, now I see go lacks the bindings for syscall.EBADMSG. Thanks for
> sending a PR upstream too.
>
The right thing to do is run sysctl/mkall.sh[1] on supported OpenBSD update it
upstream, because it know about OpenBSD... how it was a decad
On 2024/02/09 01:58:42 +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:57:20 +0100,
> Omar Polo wrote:
> > [...]
> > and on docker-buildx:
> >
> > - the patches to change syscall.EBADMSG to syscall.Errno(0x5c) are
> >strange indeed. if it's not needed (haven't tried), it should be
On Fri, 09 Feb 2024 01:58:42 +0100,
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> > not sure if a port would help. from my understanding how of go orks,
> > we'd need to feed diffs upstream and wait for all consumers to make new
> > releases after bumping the dependencies.
> >
>
> ok, I'll try to make a patch t
On 2024/02/09 01:58:42 +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > Some early comments on docker-cli:
> >
> > - don't remove @conflict from the PLIST
>
> I'm confused. My idea was to allow install
The line "@conflict docker-*" in PLIST means that this package conflicts
with any version of the "docker"
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 16:57:20 +0100,
Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > Shall it be simple included into go port to avoid patching almost each go
> > application which uses fsutils?
>
> not sure if a port would help. from my understanding how of go orks,
> we'd need to feed diffs upstream and wait for all cons
On 2024/02/08 15:40:08 +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:27:05 +0100,
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> >
> > I'd like a share that future patch is required for docker.
> >
> > Right now any use of docker cli plugin produces (and not removed!) unix
> > socker
> > with name @
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:27:05 +0100,
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> I'd like a share that future patch is required for docker.
>
> Right now any use of docker cli plugin produces (and not removed!) unix socker
> with name @docker_clo_[UUID].
>
Here the updated diff which updated docker-cli and int
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 03:21:51 +0100,
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> Here an updated version. Now it includes:
> - update docker-cli to 25.0.3
> - adding docker-buildx
> - adding docker-compose
>
> All of this makes quite ready to use development environment.
>
I'd like a share that future patch i
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 04:05:55 +0100,
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
>
> I'm not super sure that the patches aren't required anymore; more like
> thay aren't _needed_ anymore because the patched files are gone. Haven't
> made a complete analysis of the repo, but I did find [2] which uses
> syscall, whi
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 07:20:14PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:42:08 +0100,
> Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
> >
> > There are some differences between Dockerfile handling between the two,
> > which also breaks stuff that currently works (`COPY . .` works with
> > buildx
Greeting,
On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:42:08 +0100,
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
>
> I gave this a very quick spin and I think there is something missing:
> buildx isn't used anymore, and a `docker build` is greeted with
>
> DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future
On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 03:42:08 +0100,
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto wrote:
>
> There are some differences between Dockerfile handling between the two,
> which also breaks stuff that currently works (`COPY . .` works with
> buildx, while it bails out with "When using COPY with more than one
> source file, the
Hi,
I gave this a very quick spin and I think there is something missing:
buildx isn't used anymore, and a `docker build` is greeted with
DEPRECATED: The legacy builder is deprecated and will be removed in a future
release.
Install the buildx component to build images with BuildKit:
Tested with remote podman.
All patches aren't required anymore.
--
wbr, Kirill
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/sysutils/docker-cli/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -u -r1.9 Makefile
--- Makefile20 Nov 2022
22 matches
Mail list logo
