Re: sysuitls/u-boot: split off 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs

2024-03-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/03/23 13:08, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2024/03/23 09:14, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > The diff below splits off the 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs and updates > > > them to U-Boot 2024.01. I've tested this on a few of my armv7

Re: sysuitls/u-boot: split off 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs

2024-03-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2024/03/23 09:14, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > The diff below splits off the 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs and updates > > them to U-Boot 2024.01. I've tested this on a few of my armv7 boards > > and I'm pretty confident it doesn't break

Re: sysuitls/u-boot: split off 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs

2024-03-22 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:56:35PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The diff below splits off the 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs and updates > them to U-Boot 2024.01. I've tested this on a few of my armv7 boards > and I'm pretty confident it doesn't break any of them. > > Theo, this has consequences for

sysuitls/u-boot: split off 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs

2024-03-22 Thread Mark Kettenis
The diff below splits off the 32-bit ARM Allwinner SoCs and updates them to U-Boot 2024.01. I've tested this on a few of my armv7 boards and I'm pretty confident it doesn't break any of them. Theo, this has consequences for the armv7 miniroots as the "cubie" variant includes firmwares that move f