Re: security/password-store GnuPG dependency

2017-08-20 Thread David Dahlberg
> Am 19.08.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Antoine Jacoutot : > > Since the README explicitely states gnupg2, I think we should go for this, > even > if gnupg1 is compatible, to prevent surprises in the future. > OK? Sure. Gpg1 has somewhat lesser dependencies, but lacks default support for the gpg-age

Re: security/password-store GnuPG dependency

2017-08-19 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Sat, Aug 19 2017, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:29:54AM -0400, Bernd S. wrote: >> Hello, >> >> password-store itself lists GnuPG 2 as a dependency [1], but the package >> and port install GnuPG 1.4.21 (classic), I reckon that both are compatible >> with password-store an

Re: security/password-store GnuPG dependency

2017-08-19 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:29:54AM -0400, Bernd S. wrote: > Hello, > > password-store itself lists GnuPG 2 as a dependency [1], but the package > and port install GnuPG 1.4.21 (classic), I reckon that both are compatible > with password-store and each other. > > But is there a specific reason for

security/password-store GnuPG dependency

2017-08-18 Thread Bernd S.
Hello, password-store itself lists GnuPG 2 as a dependency [1], but the package and port install GnuPG 1.4.21 (classic), I reckon that both are compatible with password-store and each other. But is there a specific reason for it to install gpg classic even when gpg2 is already installed? Or even