Daniel Jakots, 30 Aug 2016 17:28:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:42:38 +0200, frantisek holop
> wrote:
>
> > Daniel Jakots, 28 Aug 2016 10:26:
> > > If cython is installed, it's used. I don't know if we want to use
> > > it or not, hence two patches, one to use cython, the other to do
> > > without cyt
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:42:38 +0200, frantisek holop
wrote:
> Daniel Jakots, 28 Aug 2016 10:26:
> > If cython is installed, it's used. I don't know if we want to use
> > it or not, hence two patches, one to use cython, the other to do
> > without cython. I'm rather for adding cython as a build dep
Daniel Jakots, 28 Aug 2016 10:26:
> If cython is installed, it's used. I don't know if we want to use it or
> not, hence two patches, one to use cython, the other to do without
> cython. I'm rather for adding cython as a build depend and use it but
> no strong opinion.
why not have a cython flavor
Hi,
Here are two different diff to update databases/py-peewee.
If cython is installed, it's used. I don't know if we want to use it or
not, hence two patches, one to use cython, the other to do without
cython. I'm rather for adding cython as a build depend and use it but
no strong opinion.
Thoug
