On 2008/08/26 07:54, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> UHmm ok, i understand, but i think that the doc should be change, or add
> some topic about it, because the point in the doc is for use flavours,
> anyway, thx for answer.
Here are excerpts from bsd.port.mk(5), "FLAVORS AND MULTI_PACKAGES".
Sta
UHmm ok, i understand, but i think that the doc should be change, or add
some topic about it, because the point in the doc is for use flavours,
anyway, thx for answer.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On 2008/08/21 18:06, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> > t
On 2008/08/21 18:06, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> thx stuart i'll work on it.
> and i have a dude, why use MULTIPACKAGES instead FLAVORS?
> i know what's the difefrence between multipackages and flavours, but why did
> you change it on the port?
> any difference in the use?
Some architectures are al
thx stuart i'll work on it.
and i have a dude, why use MULTIPACKAGES instead FLAVORS?
i know what's the difefrence between multipackages and flavours, but why did
you change it on the port?
any difference in the use?
thx
if anyone want help me (test, comments) with the port, thx.
On Thu, Aug 21,
On 2008/08/20 21:30, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> I ported the cherokee version 0.7.2 , 1 week ago, and it compile and install
> ok.
> But the last stable version 0.8.1 don't appear to work.
>
> This is my work-in-progress port (working on i386).
This is a bit better but not complete yet; it needs
I ported the cherokee version 0.7.2 , 1 week ago, and it compile and install
ok.
But the last stable version 0.8.1 don't appear to work.
This is my work-in-progress port (working on i386).
The name is cherokee, a very fast webserver -->
http://www.cherokee-project.com/
when I install the package,
On 2008/08/20 20:52, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> no, i don?t,
> thx for answer
so, if you can't work it out yourself, you should include the
work-in-progress port so people can try and help.
no, i don´t,
thx for answer
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On 2008/08/20 18:36, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > Im working on a port, it has dynamic libs, but when i try make a "make
> > plist" it only create the pkg/PLIST but not the PFRA
On 2008/08/20 18:36, Fernando Quintero wrote:
> Hi list,
> Im working on a port, it has dynamic libs, but when i try make a "make
> plist" it only create the pkg/PLIST but not the PFRAG.shared file.
> so i don't know why. (yes, i use SHARED_LIBS into the Makefile)_
> off course the binaries fails
Hi list,
Im working on a port, it has dynamic libs, but when i try make a "make
plist" it only create the pkg/PLIST but not the PFRAG.shared file.
so i don't know why. (yes, i use SHARED_LIBS into the Makefile)_
off course the binaries fails when i ran these, after the package
installation
any h
10 matches
Mail list logo
