On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:54:26AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:46:59AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:32:50AM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > > > We could have some framework for such apps (and for things like CPAN,
> > > > RubyGems and so
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 05:46:59AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:32:50AM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > > We could have some framework for such apps (and for things like CPAN,
> > > RubyGems and so on) to offload maintaince burden for us, though...
> >
> > Actually, I'd
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:32:50AM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> > We could have some framework for such apps (and for things like CPAN,
> > RubyGems and so on) to offload maintaince burden for us, though...
>
> Actually, I'd love to see the ports in question in until there is such
> framew
> We could have some framework for such apps (and for things like CPAN,
> RubyGems and so on) to offload maintaince burden for us, though...
Actually, I'd love to see the ports in question in until there is such
framework. I always do ports for anything I install, as it is much easier to
deal wi
> sabredav is developed so that project can integrate it into their own
> projects -- it's not really meant to be installed this way.
> Or do you know anything that depends on it? In any way owncloud does exactly
> the right thing.
Just so we are clear, I am not saying I will remove it. The poin
> sabredav is not a webapp, it's a library, it seems maintained (benoit@
> updated it to the latest version 5 days ago) and www/owncloud could make
> use of it instead of using its own forked copy...
sabredav is developed so that project can integrate it into their own projects
-- it's not really
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:24:55PM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 2013/11/2 Antoine Jacoutot :
> > Hi.
> >
> > Here's a list of web apps that are candidate for removal in ports.
> > The main reason is that they don't add any added value (basically
> > and enhanced tar xzf of upstream's tarball with n
2013/11/2 Antoine Jacoutot :
> Hi.
>
> Here's a list of web apps that are candidate for removal in ports.
> The main reason is that they don't add any added value (basically
> and enhanced tar xzf of upstream's tarball with nothing OpenBSD
> specific nor added documentation) and that they are often
Le 04/11/2013 08:26, David Coppa a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
So please speak up if you have any objection.
Thanks.
flyspray
mediawiki
mediawiki-CategoryTree
mediawiki-httpauth
mycalendar
myreview
phpicalendar
pmwiki
pyblosxom
sabredav
xinha
tik tok, tic
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>> So please speak up if you have any objection.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> flyspray
>> mediawiki
>> mediawiki-CategoryTree
>> mediawiki-httpauth
>> mycalendar
>> myreview
>> phpicalendar
>> pmwiki
>> pyblosxom
>> sabredav
>> xinha
>
> tik tok, tic toc
> So please speak up if you have any objection.
> Thanks.
>
> flyspray
> mediawiki
> mediawiki-CategoryTree
> mediawiki-httpauth
> mycalendar
> myreview
> phpicalendar
> pmwiki
> pyblosxom
> sabredav
> xinha
tik tok, tic toc...
--
Antoine
Quoting Antoine Jacoutot :
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Even though I can understand why outdated software should not have
the imprimatur of OpenBSD, my feeling is that it is better to have
more packages than less. Even if some are outdated, the ports
infrastruc
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Vijay Sankar wrote:
> Even though I can understand why outdated software should not have
> the imprimatur of OpenBSD, my feeling is that it is better to have
> more packages than less. Even if some are outdated, the ports
> infrastructure allows someone to
Quoting Antoine Jacoutot :
Hi.
Here's a list of web apps that are candidate for removal in ports.
The main reason is that they don't add any added value (basically
and enhanced tar xzf of upstream's tarball with nothing OpenBSD
specific nor added documentation) and that they are often left
unma
Hi.
Here's a list of web apps that are candidate for removal in ports.
The main reason is that they don't add any added value (basically
and enhanced tar xzf of upstream's tarball with nothing OpenBSD
specific nor added documentation) and that they are often left
unmaintainned and outdated in the
15 matches
Mail list logo
