On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:17:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Currently scripting an installation of Python when bringing up a
> machine from scratch is a bit annoying. pkg_add has % syntax but you
> need to know the major/minor version, "pkg_add python%2.7" is ok because
> it's not very like
On 2020/01/07 11:13, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> I like the idea. Still wondering if this should be considered non-meta
> and install python3/pydoc3/etc as well... But in Python land I'm a
> guest, so please do whatever you think is better. :)
Previously we didn't install these symlinks at all. But now
I like the idea. Still wondering if this should be considered non-meta
and install python3/pydoc3/etc as well... But in Python land I'm a
guest, so please do whatever you think is better. :)
пн, 6 янв. 2020 г. в 21:20, Stuart Henderson :
>
> Currently scripting an installation of Python when bring
What does anyone think about adding a stupid meta/python3 port so
that you can just do "pkg_add python3"?
That is a very good idea!
-JP
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:17:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Currently scripting an installation of Python when bringing up a
> machine from scratch is a bit annoying. pkg_add has % syntax but you
> need to know the major/minor version, "pkg_add python%2.7" is ok because
> it's not very like
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:17:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Currently scripting an installation of Python when bringing up a
> machine from scratch is a bit annoying. pkg_add has % syntax but you
> need to know the major/minor version, "pkg_add python%2.7" is ok because
> it's not very like
Currently scripting an installation of Python when bringing up a
machine from scratch is a bit annoying. pkg_add has % syntax but you
need to know the major/minor version, "pkg_add python%2.7" is ok because
it's not very likely to change, but for Python 3 which still receives
updates it's not so go
