Hi,
I'd recommend using an HTTP mirror for pkg_add(8), arguably less
protocol overhead.
-Bryan.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 02:04:37AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:07:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson said that
> > the ftp problems are only when going through ftp-proxy(8) which
> > mangles the SYNCH sequence needed to interrupt transfers. if you can
> > avoid ftp-pro
hmm, on Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:07:15PM +0100, Stuart Henderson said that
> the ftp problems are only when going through ftp-proxy(8) which
> mangles the SYNCH sequence needed to interrupt transfers. if you can
> avoid ftp-proxy then ftp should a similar speed to http.
no proxy involved tis case
On 2010/04/25 00:45, Antti Harri wrote:
>
> There used to be some problems with large packages
> and FTP sites. Maybe some of the devs could say
> if this still is relevant or not. The symptoms
> sound the same at least to me.
>
> Anyway you will most likely get far better throughput if you use
>
hmm, on Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:45:04AM +0300, Antti Harri said that
>
> There used to be some problems with large packages
> and FTP sites. Maybe some of the devs could say
> if this still is relevant or not. The symptoms
> sound the same at least to me.
the packages in question weren't particul
There used to be some problems with large packages
and FTP sites. Maybe some of the devs could say
if this still is relevant or not. The symptoms
sound the same at least to me.
Anyway you will most likely get far better throughput if you use
http, try http://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapsh
same snapshot, different notebook, can't reproduce this.
it just upgraded everything. (although way fewer packages)
sigh.
-f
--
courage is fear that has said its prayers.
hmm, on Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 10:39:57PM +0200, frantisek holop said that
> i am not sure what's going on...
> after the interruption, the package is not marked
> as needing update anymore...
oops. i cannot install it again.
but if i start the update again, it gets updated.
(meanwhile the update
i am not sure what's going on...
after the interruption, the package is not marked
as needing update anymore...
the rest of the story:
[...]
ipython-0.10 (extracting)|*|100%
Adjusting sha for /usr/local/share/examples/ipython/kernel/pkg.lM4jYRP1TK f
hi there,
i have installed the latest snapshot and i am in the
process of updating my packages.
now for the second time the upgrade process came to a total
halt at 100% of a package (this time: ipython-0.10).
disk activity:0, network activity: 0. nothing is happening.
(PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.fr.op
10 matches
Mail list logo
