Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-09 12:36 WET):
> On 2022/11/09 10:30, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 23:48 WET):
> > > On 2022/11/08 22:12, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> > > > Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 20:37 WET):
> > > > > here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be
On 2022/11/09 10:30, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 23:48 WET):
> > On 2022/11/08 22:12, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> > > Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 20:37 WET):
> > > > here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be too much pain to turn
> > > > it into a proper python.po
Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 23:48 WET):
> On 2022/11/08 22:12, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 20:37 WET):
> > > here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be too much pain to turn
> > > it into a proper python.port.mk port but we can get a bit closer and use
> >
On 2022/11/08 22:12, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 20:37 WET):
> > here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be too much pain to turn
> > it into a proper python.port.mk port but we can get a bit closer and use
> > some more bits of the ports framework.
> >
> > I also
Stuart Henderson wrote (2022-11-08 20:37 WET):
> here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be too much pain to turn
> it into a proper python.port.mk port but we can get a bit closer and use
> some more bits of the ports framework.
>
> I also wondered if it should it be installed (or aliased) to
here are some tweaks, it looks like it will be too much pain to turn
it into a proper python.port.mk port but we can get a bit closer and use
some more bits of the ports framework.
I also wondered if it should it be installed (or aliased) to CodeChecker
to match the case of the usage commands etc?
On 2022/11/08 19:02, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/11/08 19:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022/11/08 19:35, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > On 2022/11/08 18:21:49 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > SUBST_CMD is probably better suited in post-patch.
> > >
> > > (or even pre-configure)
> >
> > po
On 2022/11/08 19:35, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2022/11/08 18:21:49 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > SUBST_CMD is probably better suited in post-patch.
>
> (or even pre-configure)
post-patch is about the worst place for SUBST_CMD, it breaks
make patch
make update-patches
pre-configure is way better
On 2022/11/08 19:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/11/08 19:35, Omar Polo wrote:
> > On 2022/11/08 18:21:49 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > SUBST_CMD is probably better suited in post-patch.
> >
> > (or even pre-configure)
>
> post-patch is about the worst place for SUBST_CMD, it breaks
>
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> Dear porters,
>
> codechecker is a scan-build replacement that supports cross translation
> analysis for C.
>
> A huge thanks to sdk@ for the hand holding and showing me how to
> port this.
> We removed the web server components from
On 2022/11/08 18:21:49 +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> > Dear porters,
> >
> > codechecker is a scan-build replacement that supports cross translation
> > analysis for C.
> >
> > A huge thanks to sdk@ for the hand holding and showing m
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 07:07:50PM +0100, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> Dear porters,
>
> codechecker is a scan-build replacement that supports cross translation
> analysis for C.
>
> A huge thanks to sdk@ for the hand holding and showing me how to
> port this.
> We removed the web server components from
Dear porters,
codechecker is a scan-build replacement that supports cross translation
analysis for C.
A huge thanks to sdk@ for the hand holding and showing me how to
port this.
We removed the web server components from the build because it would
use npm.
The port and dependencies are attached.
13 matches
Mail list logo
