On Mon 2016.04.04 at 15:22 -0400, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> On Wed 2016.03.23 at 13:27 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2016/03/23 08:48, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > > I believe the cgi/mail wrapper check could actually look at the defined
> > > group membership instead.
> >
> > Oh this is a much b
On Wed 2016.03.23 at 13:27 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/03/23 08:48, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> > I believe the cgi/mail wrapper check could actually look at the defined
> > group membership instead.
>
> Oh this is a much better approach. I was considering rewriting the check
> to allow an
On 2016/03/23 08:48, Okan Demirmen wrote:
> I believe the cgi/mail wrapper check could actually look at the defined
> group membership instead.
Oh this is a much better approach. I was considering rewriting the check
to allow any one of a hardcoded list, but that's a much better idea.
I'm not usi
Hi,
As I saw sthen's last commit message, it reminded me that I wanted to
look into the issue surrounding the 'wrong GID' problem, which is the
only reason we have a FLAVOR for every MTA. (as noted below, we probably
need more if we are to continue this path!)
Unfortunately, the way mailman does
